节点文献
论中国移动通信产业网络转型下的监管转型
China’s Mobile Phone Industry on the Regulatory Network in Transition
【作者】 王伟;
【导师】 齐平茹;
【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 , 国民经济学, 2006, 硕士
【摘要】 随着移动通信产业的迅速发展,“转型”已经成为业界的新视点,中国移动通信产业正在酝酿一次重大的变革。一方面,中国移动电信运营商正在努力将通信网络升级至3G网络,由原来的提供基础信息服务扩展到提供综合性信息服务,为企业发展创造新的增长点;另一方面,管制机构为适应中国移动通信产业发展的新特点,根据“退后一步、站高一步”的新思路,在监管措施、机构设置等方面进行转型,在政策和监管方式上为中国移动通信产业实现有效竞争、迅速发展而保驾护航,使电信产业在国民经济可持续发展的大战略中起到主导作用。
【Abstract】 As a leading industry of national economy, telecommunications industrywill play an important role in the development of economy in the future Mobilecommunications industry is the core of the telecommunications industry. Afterseveral years’ rapid development, mobile communications industry has shownmany problems which should be solved by appealing to industrial upgradingand transformation. This paper intends to analyze the trend and direction ofChina’s mobile phone industry from the perspective of the network transitionand regulation transition of the China’s mobile phone industry.Included in this paper are six parts:In accordance with the time sequence, the first part briefly introducedChina’s mobile phone industry development in the history of reform andopening-up. Before 1994, the China’s all telecom had been exclusivelymonopolized by China Telecom. In 1994, China Unicom was established themonopoly of China’s basic telecommunications operations area by ChinaTelecom began to break. In 2000, China Mobile Communications Corporation isseparated from China Telecom, and began to start exclusive mobilecommunications business. Since 2005, China’s mobile communications industryentered transition;the industrial structure of mobile communications began toupgrade. The second part focuses on analyzing the government’s control of thetelecom industry and regulatory basis for the reform process. Natural monopolytheory is the fundamental basis of controlled telecommunications industry, atthe same time telecommunications were used as military, social and economicpolicy strategies supply, techno-economic characteristics of thetelecommunications industry is the major cause of long-term governmentcontrol. So far the telecom industry has experienced two regulatory reforms.:First, from 1994-2000, China Unicom is separated from China Telecom, andChina Unicom broke the monopoly of China Telecom market situation;thesecond reform from 1999-2001, Control of the Ministry of Information Industrytelecommunications industry make six basic telecommunication operatorsformed which are responsible for all services.The third part describes the latest development of China’s mobilecommunications market trends. First, the trend of slow growth in mobile phoneusers every year is obvious, but the time of phone continues to increase .Second,China’s mobile phone industry revenue growth is significantly improved;Third,the mobile telephone communications evidently take place of fixed telephonecommunications;Fourth, the means of competition between mobile operatorsare more specialized and various. It breaks through the only form of pricecompetition in the past, and at the same time the industrial chain of competitionextends to both sides. Fifth, the mobile telecommunications operators and fixedtelecommunications operators have already made the preparation of thetransition to the 3G network ready.Part IV introduces competitive market theory. It provides the theoreticalbasis for the regulatory transition of mobile communications industry. Thecompetitive market is threatening for potential competitors to enter the market,and forcing existing operators to improve operating efficiency. In thecompetitive market existing manufacturers and new entrants do not existabsolute cost is advantage;market competition does not have entranceregulation and price controls. Under such circumstances, the market in the longterm will not exist inefficiency. If the governmental regulatory agencies,according to the content of competitive market theory, can proceed reform,decrease the mobile communications industry access barriers, reduce pricecontrols, and try to eliminate existing mobile operators’ cost advantages.Reform will encourage more enterprises to join in the development of mobilecommunications industry. Mobile communications market competition will bemore complete. After trial, the ultimate outstanding enterprises will emerge, 3Gnetwork construction is accelerated, and the whole mobile communicationindustry is promoted to improve efficiency.Part V focuses on the China’s mobile phone industry to explore thetransition under the regulatory transition in the network. First in the accesscontrol, by reducing access barriers, the new enterprises are introduced to breakthe existing double oligopoly situation. By analyzing Orr’s small dynamicmodel of market to show that the easing access control can stimulate thecreation of existing businesses and businesses recently entered. Furthermore,after the release of access control, the three existing enterprises may haveprevented access to conduct different responses. Second, easing price controlsfor regulatory agencies fixed communications and mobile communications incertain areas by permitting fee which has been adjusted to limit benefit systemcontrol. This is a major step forward for price control policies. But there are stillsome shortcomings of insurmountable price for regulation;therefore, theultimate objective is to introduce price control into mobile communicationsindustry in a state of full competition without price controls. Third, theenhancement of social control to strengthen Internet exchange, unfaircompetition and network security control. Basic Telecommunications businessesand Internet communications are sluggish to the mobile communication networkin a weak marginalized telecommunications operators which are conducive tothe development of new enterprises into the mobile communications market.Unfair competition not only caused the loss of state resources, but also hurt theinterests of consumers. For Telecommunications regulatory departments, wemust, on the one hand, strengthen legislation, improve the fight against unfaircompetition laws and regulations, strengthen their own capacity to regulate andcontrol efficiency, manage the movement of the unfair competition betweenoperators through legal and administrative means;On the other hand, we muststrengthen communication with the consumer, listen to the views andsuggestions of consumers. In order to build a mobile communications marketenvironment for fair competition, Network security issues seriously harm theinterests of consumers, and have the negative impact on social order. Throughthe introduction of real-name system into mobile phone operators, the mobilephone operators should be responsible for strengthening network security.Fourth, scattered regulatory powers are not accustomed to the integration trendof mobile communications network, the Internet and cable network in 3G.. It is afeasible measure to study the experience of institutional reform in developedcountries and to set up effective regulatory bodyPart VI summarizes the main points of the thesis. Mobile communicationsnetwork transition in industries is not only related to the future development ofmobile communications, but also to the development of our national economy.It has great significance. Both the operators and regulatory bodies should havelong-term vision. They should neglect the immediate interest and pay closeattention to the interests of the nation, and make great efforts to achieve rapiddevelopment and full competition within the industry.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 吉林大学 【网络出版年期】2006年 10期
- 【分类号】F626.5
- 【被引频次】3
- 【下载频次】185