【作者】 刘冬宇；

【导师】 赖宇；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事审判监督程序是指人民法院、人民检察院对于已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定,发现在认定事实上或者适用法律上确有错误依法提起,并由人民法院重新审理的一种特殊的诉讼程序。它以主体特定、审理对象特定等为特征。刑事审判监督程序有着坚实的理论基础,辩证唯物主义认识论是其哲学基础,人权保障和司法公正是其法理基础,随着我国依法治国步伐的加快,人权保障越来越成为人们关注的焦点,那么,在社会各个领域尤其是法律领域,如何促进司法公正实现社会正义就更为人们所重视,因为人权保障和司法公正是相辅相成的关系。运用证据对案件事实进行证明是刑事诉讼的重要环节,本文从证据的评定内容和评定方法两方面论述了刑事审判监督程序中的证据评定。在分析我国现行刑事审判监督程序的实际情况的前提下,结合我国的具体国情,比较国际上的先进做法,有选择地找出适合借鉴的对象,尝试着提出几点发展出路。更多还原

【Abstract】 Along with the implement of our country strategy of rule country by law and socialism market economy construction of propulsion, judicial fair, human rights guarantee of the idea goes deeply into public increasingly, the procedure for criminal trial supervision becomes rectifying mistake judge, guarantee accused person the important procedure of the legal rights. The direct procedure of the pertaining to crime judgment of with sound norm is an important body which cures country by law doubtless now, but because of our country use the "practical and realistic" policy of the party as an own instruction thought for long time, have no oneself should have of right of firm theories foundation, and rule the laws of the direct procedure of the pertaining to crime judgment to all exist so or so of blemish and shortage, regardless from push forward our country rule by law , the step of country headway angle still from is in line with angle with international law, produced extremely disadvantageous influence. Therefore set out the actual state of our country, according to the advanced way of some nations in the world, the perfection of our country of the procedure of criminal trial supervision goes necessarily.This text mainly state our country the procedure for criminal trial supervision to elaborate four contents:The first part mainly elaborated the concept and the characteristic of the procedure of criminal trial supervision. Because our country current pertaining to crime judgment direct the procedure isn’t perfect, relevant basic concepts all have no definitely, the scholars are also profusion of different opinions, they cannot go to the same opinion. This text the introduction analyzed also to relatively have the representative’s a few standpoints currently. Explicit the pertaining to crime judge a basic contents of inspecting the procedure, we have not difficult detection, first report isn’t a pertaining to crime judgment to inspect procedure of basic contents; Can’t judge pertaining to crime to inspect procedure to comprehend for the job power of the court of the people scope purely, but neglect people to judge direct the position and the function within procedure in the pertaining to crime secondly. Right comprehend our country the characteristic of the direct procedure of the form judgment ruled by current code of criminal court is accurate to comprehend our country judgment direct within更多还原