【作者】 李开宇；

【导师】 那力；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 法律， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 知识产权请求权是为了保持知识产权的绝对性和支配性特点而存在的救济性权利,是保护知识产权的绝对权方法。由于绝对权保护方法在理论研究上相对滞后,加之我国独特的民事责任体系造成侵权行为法体系的混乱,使得我国现行民法上没有确立知识产权请求权制度。目前,虽然已有学者认识到知识产权请求权的存在,但总体上这种认识是不全面、不系统和不统一的。这种理论认识上的缺位,势必会导致立法和司法实践过程中的混乱状态,不利于发挥知识产权请求权对其基础权利的保护作用。因此有必要对这一问题加以深入的理论探讨,以澄清当前存在的模糊认识。本文论述了知识产权请求权的存在依据,并通过与物权请求权的比较研究,阐述了知识产权请求权的概念、性质、基本内容等。提出为了有效地保护知识产权,在我国法律上应当确立临时禁令、消除危险、停止侵害、赔礼道歉和消除影响等知识产权请求权类型。更多还原

【Abstract】 The purpose of the claim of intellectual property is to maintain the absolute and dominative attribute of intellectual property. It is the absolute method for the protection of intellectual property. As the absolute method is backward in theory and the unique structure of the civil liability in China raised the confusion of the system of the tort law, there is not the claim of intellectual property. There are two kinds of remedies for intellectual property which are the claims of intellectual property and jus in personam. To get an effective protection to intellectual property, we should establish the system of the claim of intellectual property .Although the law has primarily stipulated the temporary measure similar to it, namely the injunction before and during the litigations, the overall cognition is still unsystematic and disunited. In the general provisions of the draft of the civil code presided by the scholars, some stipulate clearly the system of the claim of intellectual property, the others just explain that the claim of jus ad rem can be apply to intellectual property in the explanation of the draft; as for the frame of intellectual property law written by the specialist in intellectual property law, there is no concept of this type of claim .The weakness in the cognition of the claim of intellectual property in theory has resulted in the confusing situation in legislation and juridical practice .The weakness is no good to bring the role of the protection of the claim of intellectual property into play either. So it is necessary to study further on this question in theory. It is the purpose of this article that it can benefit the protection of intellectual property.There are four chapters in the article.Chapter one primarily discusses that the claim of intellectual property exists both in theory and in practice. The conclusion of the existence of the claim of intellectual property in theory is reasoned out through the deductive method. Firstly, understand the essence of the right of claim according to its origin. The actual meaning of the right of claim is to bring the civil subject about the basic right in substantive law for the execution of litigious right. It is the measure that the civil subject seeks judicial remedy. Then there are two kinds of claims for the更多还原