【作者】 李楠；

【导师】 杜金榜；

【作者基本信息】 广东外语外贸大学 ， 外国语言学及应用语言学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文对法庭交叉询问中会话含义的现象进行研究,旨在揭示会话含义对公诉人/律师在法庭交叉询问中实现质疑证人/被告证词目的所起的作用并发现主要的会话含义的语言实现形式。 根据Levinson的会话含义原则,我们在汉语法庭的交叉询问中辨别出三种会话含义的推导策略:扩展,详述和否定。在每个策略下面介绍了一些语言实现形式,例如:推导出强的表达方式来否定证人/被告的证词,使证人/被告说出额外的含义,确切说明某专门术语以揭露更多的内容等。 本文进一步展示公诉人/律师怎样用他们从证人/被告的证词中得出的会话含义来质疑证人/被告的证词。公诉人/律师一般从四个方面来质疑证人/被告的证词语:客观性、一致性、资格和能力。 我们希望本文的研究能够有助于认识会话含义对质疑证人/被告证词的作用,加深对会话含义理论的了解;有助于律师更好地利用会话含义推导策略,从而使他们在法庭交叉询问中的工作更有效。更多还原

【Abstract】 The thesis reports on a conversation analysis between prosecutors /counsel and defendants/witnesses in cross-examination. The aim of this study is to find out how conversational implicature contributes to the challenge of witnesses/defendants’ testimony in cross-examination and main conversational implicature-deriving strategies.Based on Levinson’s conversational implicature principles as the theoretical framework and Chinese data, three implicature-deriving strategies are found out. They are: enrichment, amplification and negation. The research introduces some linguistic means under each strategy, such as deriving strong expressions to negate the witnesses/defendants’ testimony, making the witnesses/defendants’ speak out the extra meaning, specifying the special term to reveal more, etc.Importantly, the research shows further how prosecutors/counsel use the implicature they get from witnesses/defendants’ testimony to challenge witnesses/defendants’ testimony. Four areas where prosecutors/counsel may launch their attack are introduced: objectivity, consistency, qualifications and capacity.This thesis may deepen the understanding of conversational implicature and challenge of witnesses/defendants’ testimony in court cross-examination. It is also hoped that lawyers can do a more effective job in cross-examination when they know more about conversational implicature and make proper use of it.更多还原