【作者】 余维海；

【导师】 曹天禄；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 国际政治， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 新现实主义和新自由制度主义是西方国际关系理论第四次论战中的两大重要流派,国际合作问题则是双方在论战中争论的焦点问题之一。双方对国际合作问题的理解和阐述是随着这次论战而逐渐成熟起来的。在论战中它们对无政府状态的国际社会中国际合作的前景、维持国际合作的条件、阻碍国际合作的因素等方面的看法存在重大差异并展开了激烈的争辩。同时,随着论战的深入,双方对国际合作问题的认识进行了部分地修正或进一步细化,它们的国际合作观在某些方面也表现出某种趋同的倾向,这无疑会对理解双方的国际合作观带来诸多的困难和不便。 本文从新现实主义和新自由制度主义的主要思想出发,总结了双方在国际合作问题进行论争中的几个争论焦点,并以此为线索和着眼点比较了双方国际合作观的差异性。另一方面,本文又把新现实主义和新自由制度主义的国际合作观作为一个整体,对它进行了客观地评价,这对于全面、正确地理解双方的国际合作观是大有裨益的。 文章分了五部分进行论述。文章第一部分是导论部分。该部分介绍了研究的缘起和意义,评析了国内外研究现状,界定了几个核心概念,提出了本文的基本研究方法。文章第二部分总结了新现实主义与新自由制度主义两个理论学派的基本思想,为理解双方的国际合作观奠定了基础。文章第三部分系统比较了新现实主义和新自由制度主义的国际合作观。该部分从无政府状态的性质和后果、权力与国际制度、收益分配与合作、行为体数量假设、国家的优先目标等五个方面对双方的国际合作观进行了比较。贯穿于该部分的一条主线是:新现实主义认为,由于权力的因素,国际合作的前景是悲观的;而新自由制度主义则认为,由于制度的作用,国际合作的前景并没有新现实主义所想象的那样悲观。文章第四部分对双方国际合作观进行了客观的评析。该部分既指出了双方国际合作观的共性及其对推动国际关系理论发展的进步性,又从认识论、方法论和本体论三个角度对它们的局限性进行了客观的评价。第五部分是文章的结语。该部分对整个文章的思路和框架结构进行了总结,之后指出了比较、研究新现实主义和新自由制度主义国际合作观对中国的三点启示。更多还原

【Abstract】 Neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism are the two main schools in the 4 western international relations theory debate, in which international cooperation was one of the core issues. Either side’s understandings and statements on international cooperation issue had become mature along with the debate, in which they differed greatly and argued hotly in many aspects, such as in the prospect for international cooperation, the maintaining conditions and obstacles for international cooperation in the anarchy world. In addition, as their debates went further, their thoughts on international cooperation had a tendency of convergence in some degree because both of them revisited or refined their views on international cooperation partially, which would add much difficulty and inconvenience for understanding both sides’ thoughts about international cooperation doubtlessly.This thesis begins with the introduction of the neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism thoughts. It summarizes some core issues in both sides’ debates on international cooperation and taken them as the clue and starting point, the thesis makes a comparison on the differences in both sides’ thoughts on international cooperation. Later, this thesis treats the neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism thoughts about international cooperation as a whole and appraises it objectively, which will do a great deal of good to understanding them comprehensively and accurately.Five sections are included in this thesis. The first section acts as introduction of the thesis. It introduces the origin of this thesis’ title, the significance of the research, the up-to-now related research both at home and abroad. It also defines some core concepts in this thesis and introduces the research method. Section Two makes a summary of the main viewpoints of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism, which settles a good foundation for a further understanding of each side’s thoughts about international cooperation. Section Three makes a comparison between the main viewpoints of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism from five aspects, i.e. the quality and sequence of anarchy, power and institution, the distribution of income and cooperation, actors’ number hypothesis, the nations’ prior aim. A theme that runs through this section is that neorealism see a pessimistic prospect for cooperationbecause of the concerning about power, while neoliberal institutionalism don’t agree because they see the function of institution. Section Four makes an objective appraisal on both sides’ viewpoints about international cooperation. On the one hand, this section discusses their validity, commonness and progress for international relations theory;on the other hand, it also discusses their limits objectively from epistemology, methodology and ontology point of view. Section Five is the epilogue of this thesis. In this part, a conclusion about the theme and structure of the whole thesis will be made. And it ends with three inspirations to China for the comparison and study of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism thoughts about international cooperation.更多还原