【作者】 黄为之；

【导师】 李双元；

【作者基本信息】 湖南师范大学 ， 法学理论， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 和解合同是当事人约定互相让步,以终止争执或排除法律关系不明确状态的合同。和解合同以当事人对已经发生的争执或法律关系不明确的事项,在意思自治的基础上进行处理为核心内容,可以有效地终止争执或防止争执的发生。和解是人们自治解决民事纠纷最常用最典型的方式,和解合同的立法与研究对于规范并充实诉讼外民事纠纷的解决机制具有重要意义,但我国现有立法对和解合同尚无规定,学界目前也没有对该类合同进行系统研究的论文或专著。本文运用比较研究的方法,借鉴大陆法系国家与地区的立法与学说,从立法论的角度,对和解合同的概念、要件、性质和效力做了较为全面的探讨,对现有几部民法典草案建议稿中关于和解合同的立法设计进行了较为深入的分析和检讨。 本文共分五个部分: 第一部分在粗略分析域外和解合同立法例以及我国关于和解合同立法与研究现状的基础上,论证了从立法论角度研究和解合同的必要性,并明确了本文研究的体系性前提。 第二部分论证了和解作为合同的正当性,以大陆法系各个国家与地区关于和解合同概念的立法为参照,对我国现有的两部民法典草案建议稿中和解合同概念的规定进行了检讨,并进一步厘清了和解合同的外延,其中,重点讨论了和解与诉讼外调解的关系,最后对和解合同的价值进行了深入分析。 第三部分对和解合同的三个要件做了较为深入的探讨,其中重点讨论了作为和解合同客体的法律关系的范围。 第四部分首先提出和解合同包含程序性因素,认为应在和解合同立法中,对诉讼外调解进行统一规制,并借鉴《埃塞俄比亚民法典》的做法,提出了具体的立法设想;其次对和解合同本质上属于债权合同的通说提出质疑,论证了和解合同有可能为物权合同;接下来论证了和解合同不必定为双务合同、和解合同属于诺成合同等问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Compromise contracts are contracts in which both of the parties yield to the opposing party in order to terminate the dispute between each other concerning private rights or to obviate the uncertain state of the legal relation between the two parties. In compromise contracts, two parties deal with the dispute or the uncertain legal relation between each other according to the will of their own. By compromising people can terminate disputes or prevent the occurrence of disputes effectively. And compromising is the most typical way by which people settle disputes between each other concerning private rights by themselves. It is very important for us to enhance the system of dispute settlement by studying on the compromise contract. But there is no compromise contract legislation in our country, and there is no paper or monograph on it so far. This thesis, benefit from the legislation and theory of compromise contract of civil law countries and regions, does a good research into the concept, constitute element, nature and effect of compromise contract by the way of comparative study. It embraces fives parts.Part I analyzing the compromise contract legislation of civil law countries and regions, and the present researches on compromise contract in our country, argues that our study on compromise contract must aim at lawmaking, and defines the systematical premise of this thesis.Part II argues that the agreement of compromising is a contract, and defines the denotation and connotation of compromise contract.Part III does a good study on the three constitute elements of compromise contract, defining the sphere of the legal relation which is the object of compromising.Part IV firstly puts forward that compromise contracts embrace program factors, considers that in compromise contracts legislation themediation out of law suits should be regulated, and brings forward concrete assumptions by drawing lessons from "civil code of Ethiopia". Secondly, the dominant ideology that compromise contracts belong to creditor’s contract is oppugned and it’s demonstrated that compromise contracts may be real contracts. And then it argues that a compromise contract is not necessarily a bilateral contract, a compromise contract belongs to informal contract, consensual contract, etc.Part V puts forward that we should study the effect of compromise contracts on the basis of the ascertainable effect of compromise contracts by drawing lessons from Professor Chen Ziqiang, who is in Taiwan of China, and criticized the arguments between the opinions of cognizance effect and creative effect in the academic community. It also probes into the effect of compromise contracts on the parties of the contract and the third party, and the effect obstacles of compromise contracts, through the main line of the passiveness and activeness of the ascertainable effect of compromise contracts. Above all, it emphasizes on analyzing the relation of compromise contracts, unconscionability and mistake system.At last the concluding part present a proposal of the legislation of compromise contract.更多还原