【作者】 付琴；

【导师】 裴丽萍；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 经济法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 债权人代位权制度作为债的保全措施之一,在法国、日本等国较为完备。我国起步较晚,1999 年制定统一合同法时才引进这一制度,而且由于《合同法》的规定过于原则,最高人民法院《合同法解释(一)》又突破了传统民法理论,一些理论和实践问题没能得到很好解决,迫切需要修改完善。特别是行使代位权的效果归属方面,我国采用了“优先受偿说”,而否认了传统的“入库规则说”,使得这一制度完全脱离原有债的保全轨迹,沿着债的实现方向前进。本文立足于我国市场经济稳定发展的国情,从理论和实践两个角度分析传统“入库规则”的合理性,驳斥其他两种理论——“优先受偿说”和“平等受偿说”,希望立法者考虑到一项立法的稳定性和长期性,恢复债权人代位权制度的本来面目; 并针对“入库规则”在现实运用中存在的不足提出一些建议和意见,使得我国的“入库规则”理论更加完善,以促使代位权制度发挥更大的功效,满足现实的需要。该文除引言外,共分为四章。第一章,概述。主要介绍了债权人代位权制度产生的意义,我国债权人代位权行使效果归属的理论争议及立法状况以及其他国家和地区关于债权人代位权行使效果归属的学说和立法,说明“入库规则”在债权人代位权制度中所起的作用和我国历史上以及其他国家和地区采用“入库规则”的事实。第二章,我国债权人代位权行使效果归属之立法选择分析。在批判“平等受偿说”和“优先受偿说”的基础上,从法理、债权、经济学以及现实意义四个方面阐述“入库规则说”的合理性。第三章,“入库规则”在我国的适用和完善。针对学者们对“入库规则”的责难和市场经济发展的现实需要,提出传统“入库规则”确实存在的不足之处,借鉴国外的相关经验,提出完善我国“入库规则”的具体途径。第四章,结论。通观全文,对全文主要观点和内容做总结性的陈述。更多还原

【Abstract】 As one of the measures to save the creditor’s rights,the creditor’s subrogation is comparatively perfect in France,Japanese etc. However, it emerged in our country very late,we didn’t fetch it in until we established uniform contract law in 1999. As the Contract Law’s rules were too fundamental and the explanation of Contract Law from the Supreme Count broke through the traditional theories of civil law,some problems in theories and practices have not been solved well and needed to amend urgently. Especially the ownership of the result of the creditor’s enforcing the subrogation, our country has adopted the " subrogation being discharged firstly " in the Contract Law, and has denied the " doctrine of collection Regulatory ". The original system totally was broken and replaced by realization of the creditor’s rights. On the base of our market economy developing, the text analyses the rationality of the “doctrine of collection Regulatory”in terms of theory and practice and refutes two kinds of other theories –the " subrogation being discharged firstly " and the " averagely distribution in the oblige " , in order to propose the legislators to consider stability and long period of time of legislation and resume true colors of creditor’s subrogation system. In order to play fully creditor’s subrogation and meet demands of reality, it put forward some suggestions to make the “doctrine of collection Regulatory”more perfect. The full text is divided into two parts altogether the preface, and it’s subject part is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is summary. Introduced the meaning in which creditor’s subrogation system produces mainly, and the countries and regions’relevant situations, and discussed that the affections out of which the subrogation is enforced on creditor, sub 一obligor and obligor in the part. So it drew the conclusion that we should choose the “doctrine of collection Regulatory ". The second chapter analyses the reason that our legislation should adopt the “doctrine of collection Regulatory ". And On the basis of criticizing the " subrogation being discharged firstly " and the " averagely distribution in the oblige ", it analyses the rationality of the " doctrine of collection Regulatory " from four respects of legal principle , creditor’s rights , economics and realistic meaning. The third chapter ", founding the need of market economic development and objection of it, analyses the weak point of the " subrogation being discharged firstly " and the foreign experience, and put forward the concrete suggestion of perfecting it. The fourth chapter make a summary to the view and main content of the full text.更多还原