【作者】 林欧；

【导师】 王新红；

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 ， 经济法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 经济转型国家的竞争法与市场经济国家的竞争法之间有许多不同之处。中国也正处于经济转型之中,参考其它转型国家的竞争立法有非常重要的意义。爱沙尼亚是转型国家中比较成功的一个,其竞争立法在实体规则和竞争主管机关等方面都有自己的特色,本文主要总结出以下三个方面:爱沙尼亚竞争法一开始规定了不正当竞争行为和垄断行为,但后来因为竞争委员会负担过重而不再处理不正当竞争行为,不正当竞争违法行为通过民事程序解决;行政垄断在爱沙尼亚竞争法中规定得比较笼统,竞争委员会在处理行政垄断时大多靠和政府机关合作解决问题;竞争委员会的机构设置不断调整,委员会极力培养成员的执法素质并大力宣扬竞争文化等。在中国的竞争立法当中,可以借鉴爱沙尼亚竞争法的实践经验,将反不正当竞争法与反垄断法分开立法,详细规定行政垄断,按现实需要设置竞争主管机关,培养高素质的竞争主管机关职员,从而使中国竞争法更趋于完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are many differences about competition law between countries with economic transition and countries with developed market economic system. Nowadays, China are also in the road of changing from planning economic system to market economic system. Under such background, it is meaningful to draw on the experience of the other transition countries. Estonia is a successful transition country, and its competition law has some characteristics such as the substantive rules and Competition Authority——Competition Board. This essay conclude mostly on three fields: unfair competition and antitrust were stipulated in competition law 1993, but Competition Board didn’t deal with unfair competition anymore but by civil procedure since 2001 because of the serious burden; Because of the general terms about anticompetitive activities of government happened, Competition Board depends on mostly cooperation with government when anticompetitive activities of government happened; Competition Board adjusts itself continuously, at the same time it trains employee and advocates competition culture. With the legislation of China’s competition law, we can draw on the experiences from Estonia such as we can divide unfair competition from antitrust for the competition legislation, regulate anticompetitive activities of government with more details, install Competition Authority pursuant to practical need, train high-quality employee。更多还原