【作者】 裴雷；

【导师】 马费成；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 情报学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 信息资源共享一直是理论界研究的热点,而研究内容一直集中讨论信息资源共享的实践和技术。近几年,关于信息资源共享的经济分析和效率分析的文章也逐渐增多,但是在信息资源共享研究模型和共享实现的层面的文章寥寥可数。把信息资源共享转化成一个理论命题,至少应该包括三个方面的内容:(1)为什么信息资源共享会出现?(2)信息资源共享形成的额外的福利(联合收益)是怎样在共享双方有效分配的?(3)信息资源共享网络是怎样形成的?目前关于共享理论的文章大多数是针对第一个问题回答的,有从历史演进角度分析的,有从需求供给角度解释的,有从资源配置角度进行阐述的,还有占主流的从成本收益角度判断和社会实践改良分析的两种思路,所以对第一个问题的回答是比较充分的。而第二个问题和第三个问题往往被人们忽视,认为所有的问题都是“思想认识”问题,一旦“思想统一,提高认识”,再加上信息基础设施的改进,信息资源共享肯定是一个迎刃而解的问题。但信息资源共享问题毕竟是一个制度问题,没有健康的制度和正向的激励措施,再好的技术条件也不可能形成高效率的信息资源共享网络。本文的研究是基于这样一个出发点,对第二个和第三个问题从方法论上提出了解决方法和思路。 全文分为五个部分: 第一部分通过对信息资源共享的历史沿革和国内理论研究作了简单的梳理,总结了国内信息资源共享理论研究的成果,指出了研究的不足。同时在信息资源配置角度,对信息资源共享的经济分析也作了简要综述,说明信息资源共享的经济实质,指出共享模型研究的重要性和必要性。随后讨论了信息资源共享模型的研究基础和现状。 第二部分创建了一个通用的信息资源共享模型,并提出了基于此模型的共享分析范式。 第三部分设计了一个只有两个参与者的信息资源共享环境,在通用分析范式下,具体考察了信息资源共享的实现过程和动态博弈,考察了政府对信息资源共享的调节和配置作用。本部分还用期刊资源共享的案例给予补充说明。 第四部分考察了多用户参与共享的分析,引入了网络协作和网络博弈的分析理论和方法,对信息资源共享网络的形成、网络的稳定性和效率作了分析。 第五部分总结了前四个部分的观点,并讨论了共享最佳规模和共享信息资源私人供给的问题,并提出了本文的不足和继续深入研究的必要性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although information resources sharing (IRS, for short) is a hot academic field in theoretical research ,the content of this research is more or less limited in the practices and the technologic solutions. Even more attentions have been concentrated in the economical analysis and efficiency evaluation, the analyses of approaches to IRS and researches on IRS models are still extra-prevalent. As a fact, the IRS theory have three main questions : (l)Why should we sharing information resources?(2)How do you reallocate the surplus welfare caused by sharing between the information users?(3)How are the information resources sharing networks formed? And now ,most articles focused on the answer to question one. Some scholars summarized the historical evolvement of IRS, some gave explanation supported by supply-demand mechanism in market theory , some took information as a case of resources allocation theory, and more used cost- income equilibrium to validate sharing behaviors .While in some articles ,IRS is regarded as a series of practice amendment. So we can give a wonderful answer to question one now. But the last two questions above are always neglected , frequently being thought as the scarcity of cognition. And the misunderstanding that information resources sharing will out of question once the information establishment is greatly improved and information users are more intelligent is very popular. In my opinion, information resources sharing is an institutional question. Without positive incentives, no matter how advanced or perfect the technology is, not will the efficient IRS come true . So this dissertation gave the primary answer to the last question in a quite innovative way, visa a self-building IRS model.This dissertation is composed of five parts, as it follows:Section one laid out the historical evolvement of IRS, summarized the main achievements in IRS theory, and pointed out its shortages. It also gave a brief comment to information resources allocation and explained the economic essence of information resources sharing which suggested the importance and necessity to build a IRS model .Then it collected some IRS models and anatomized, finally extracted the main factors of IRS.Section two built a primal IRS model and stated the standard analysis paradigm.Section three designed a 2-participant IRS model .viewed the approaches to IRS in a standard analysis paradigm and analyzed the dynamic game equilibrium in sharing bargain. Then it concentrated on the role of government in IRS and gave an example of periodicals sharing.Section four rebuilt a multi-participant IRS model, used some method in the relevant theory in networks collaboration and network games to analyze the formation .efficiency and stability of IRS networks.Section five concluded the hole article and discussed the optimistic number of sharing participants as well as the private supply of public goods such as shared information resourcesAt last ,it pointed out some flaws in the article and gave some suggestions to improve.更多还原