【作者】 王慧；

【导师】 黄进；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 国际法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 随着全球一体化的进一步发展,国际间经贸活动日益频繁。鉴于法院民商事管辖权与本国国家及国民的利益息息相关,为了更好的保护本国及国民的利益,世界各国的管辖权制度不断扩张,从而在全世界范围内形成了激烈争夺管辖权的局面。虽然扩张的管辖权能为当事人提供更加全面的司法救济,但其弊端也显而易见。对当事人,可能增加其诉讼成本和实质的不便从而造成当事人之间利益的失衡:对法院,可能出现的平行诉讼也增加了其司法负担,浪费了宝贵的司法资源。为了避免此种弊端,各国民事诉讼法纷纷开始采取一定的措施,来限制本国过度的管辖权。这些措施就是本文所要研究的国际私法中的拒绝管辖制度。 本文第一章为拒绝管辖的概述,界定拒绝管辖制度的概念和范围。根据适用依据的不同,国际民事诉讼中的拒绝管辖制度可大别为三种类型,分别是不方便法院原则下的拒绝管辖、平行诉讼下的拒绝管辖和当事人意思自治下的拒绝管辖,以下三章分别介绍拒绝管辖制度每种类型的适用模式。本文运用比较的研究方法,对不同情形下拒绝管辖的具体适用条件,分析了世界各国的相关立法例及有关国际公约的规定,揭示出具有共性的一些特点,可为我国所借鉴,最后一章为完善我国拒绝管辖制度的建议。本文分为五个部分,共四万余字。更多还原

【Abstract】 Facing the development of world intercourse, international trade business is becoming more and more. As we know, court’ s civil jurisdiction plays an important role on protecting their own country and citizen. So for their own interests, nearly every county makes great efforts to enlarge their courts’ jurisdiction, which forms a picture of sharply competing for jurisdiction. On the one hand, extensive jurisdiction can supply a more comprehensive judicial assistant for the parties. But on the other hand, its shortcomings are also obvious. As the party as concerned, the balance of parties’ interests may be destroyed by the increased judicial cost and substantive inconvenience. As court as concerned, judicial resources are comparative poor today, but the possible lis pendens will waste them. In order to avoid these phenomena’ s appearance, many countries have begun to take measures to restrain the excessive jurisdiction. Those measures are what my research on—declining jurisdiction in international private law.After defining the concept and range of declining jurisdiction, wecan divide it into three types ---forum non conveniens, lis pendens andparty’ s autonomy. By comparative means, we have analyzed every type’ s conditions in many different countries’ legal systems and some related international treaty. We find some common rules. These rules can provide some suggestion to better our Chinese civil procedure law.更多还原