【作者】 李翔宇；

【导师】 朱义坤；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 经济法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 控制股东滥用控制权将对公司和少数股东造成损害。这不仅导致公司内部利益严重失衡,而且违背了法律所追求的公平正义之终极目标。现代公司立法在承认和确立控制股东法律地位和公司事务决定权的同时,更强调对控制股东行为的规范和约束。本文对控制股东的控制机制进行研究的目的也正在于此。 本文构建的对控制股东的控制机制包括内外两个方面。内部控制机制是指控制股东自身负担的法律义务;外部控制机制主要是指少数股东和独立董事行使权力对控制股东形成约束的制度集合。 第一章通过考察约束控制股东的现实性和法理性,提出控制机制的总体原则和框架。 第二章研究了控制股东的诚信义务与责任机制。本文在诚信义务规则的制度依据、内幕交易行为是否可以适用控制股东诚信义务规则、注意义务的举证责任和封闭公司的情况等方面均提出较独到的见解。 第三章包括表决权修正、少数股东行使法定权利和独立董事制度。借鉴各国立法经验,本部分对我国新公司法相关制度的做了若干评析。更多还原

【Abstract】 When controlling shareholders abuse their authority, the behalf of corporations and minority shareholders will be damaged and the balance of corporation structure will be break. It will breach the arm of law to equity and justice. Modern corporation law not only admits that controlling shareholders have vantage ground on determining corporation affairs, but also restricts their action. It also is this paper’s objective.In the paper, the controlling mechanism over the controlling shareholders includes two aspects. As far as the inside aspect, controlling shareholders should burden the fiduciary duty; the external aspect consists of the right system of minority shareholders and independent director.The principle and frame of the controlling mechanism are presented by analyzing the necessity and feasibility of restricting the controlling shareholders in Chapter One.The fiduciary duty system is studied in Chapter two. There are some innovate opinions such as the basis of fiduciary duty system, whether the duty rule is applied to inside bargaining, the onus burden for breaching the duty of care, and the fiduciary duty system of limited company etc.The revising of voting right, the minority shareholders’ rights, and the system of independent director are be discussed in Chapter Three. And then, there are several commentaries on the articles in the new China Corporation Law.更多还原