【作者】 李飏；

【导师】 李浩；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 现代刑事诉讼程序所追求的两大价值目标是公正和效率,而简易程序的适用就是为了协调二者的矛盾,从中找到一个最佳的平衡点,从而更好的利用有限的司法资源,保障诉讼参与人的诉讼权利的实现。我国1996年3月修订的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》增设了简易程序,简易程序的设定对减轻法院的审判负担,提高司法效率有着重大的意义;同时也顺应了公正维护公民权利,有效保障人权等世界刑事诉讼的发展趋势,促进了我国司法实践由职权主义特色转向当事人主义和职权主义结合的有中国特色的控辩式审判模式。但是简易程序的设立对我国的刑事司法实践来讲尚属新生事物,制度的设立和具体的操作运行方式上都不完善,存在一些争议和缺陷。本文就我国的刑事简易程序设定的必要性、特点、发展趋势、需要完善的问题以及同国外的简易程序的比较做出讨论,提出一些个人浅见。 本文首先在第一部分叙述了简易程序的概念和分类,论证了简易程序产生的理论基础和现实基础,简约介绍了各国各地区简易程序的法律规定。全世界的犯罪以每年平均5%的速度增加,同时人们对程序正义的要求也越来越高,但是人们不可能将所有的资源都用于刑事审判。因此为了实现程序正义,同时也提高诉讼效率,唯一的方法就是设立简易程序。我们应当顺应世界潮流,提高司法效率,扩大简易程序的适用。关于简易程序的正当性,由于被告人在简易程序中失去了在普通程序中应当获得的很多权利,那简易程序是否具有正当性呢?笔者认为程序正义的本身在于公正的裁决和控辩平衡,简易程序本身保持了法官中立,控辩平衡的特点,是符合正当程序的最低要求的,也符合审判的正三角结构;而且简易程序符合社会对于实体公正的要求,具有重要的诉讼效更多还原

【Abstract】 Justice and efficiency is valuable objective of modern criminal procedure. Applying summary is to coordinate the contradiction of justice and efficiency, and find the best balance. So we can make the use of limited judicial resources, ensure realization of agent’ s privilege. In3, 1996, our country add the summary procedure in the new criminal procedural law. The summary procedure not only has it’ s significance in the lightening the court’ s trail burden, and efficiently raising the of judicature, but also comply with the development tendency of guaranteeing civil rights, and ensuring human rights, promote judicial practice’ s transform of the trail model from the function and powers system to the adversary system and the function system. But criminal summary procedure is a new style for our criminal trail practice, the system’ s establish and operation is not perfect, there are several controvert and flaw, this article is to put forward suggest about the necessity, character, development tendency of summary procedure ,and compare with the foreign criminal procedure.This arctic relates concept and sort of criminal summary procedure in the first section, demonstrates the theoretic basis and practical basis of producing summary procedure, and generalizes the prescription of the summary procedure in other countries and districts. The incidence of crime all over the world is increasing at the speed of 5% per year, meanwhile people have much move requirement on procedure justice, but people wouldn’t spend all resource on criminal trail. The only solution to balance the procedure justice and efficiency is establish the summary procedure .Theway to solute the question by increasing the judicial efficiency, enlarging the application range of the summary procedure, complying with word tendency.Defendant has little right in the summary procedure than in the common procedure. If it has legitimization, we think the essence of procedure legitimization lies in the justicial judgement and the balance of defender and accuser, the summary procedure keep the character of that the judge is neutral, defender and accuser is balanceable. The summary procedure conform to the least demand of procedure legitimization, it conform to the demand of trail construction, too. The summary procedure has its signification in the efficiency legitimization, it is suitable for the requirement of the substantive justice.In the second section, we analyze the present conditions and the questions of the Chinese summary procedure. First, to the scope of the summary procedure, we should make clear the scope on legislation, we should establish the sort system of felony and misdemeanor. To the style of trail, the prosecution should attend the trail on the court, to ensure the completeness of trail. Material of public prosecution case couldn’t wholly be send to the court, it will avoid the trail is formal. During the course of the trail, we should respect the right of choosing procedure. On the second, to guarantee the right of defendant and victim, we should change the monopolization of the court, and give the right to choose procedure to the defendant To guarantee right to learn the truth, the prosecutor should send all evidence material to the court, the court couldn’t apply the attacking evidence. To the right to seek the help of lawyers, because our criminal procedural law don’t especially graduate the right in the summary procedure, human right in the summary procedure easily be neglected. So we should reform the right to seek to help of lawyer on legal. Judge should appoint lawyer to the defendant, and prosecutor should attend the trail on court to balance the trail.From the tendency of summary procedure, we can find that not only the adversary system country but also the function and powers system country, they all combine the efficiency and human right We should pay attention to protect the human right, especially the defendant In the article, we contrast the England, Italyand other constricts, we put forward opinion about the summary procedure.更多还原