【作者】 张小霞；

【导师】 向朝阳；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 刑法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 世界上绝大多数国家的刑事法律对犯罪行为的认定只限于“犯罪即恶行”的定性认识之上,数量大小和情节轻重一般都不作为犯罪的构成要件,“社会危害性”的定性描述加上司法个别化对定量因素缺陷的弥补,就涵盖了从违警罪到轻罪再到重罪的整个公法制裁体系。所以,在违法行为的认定与制裁问题上,绝大多数国家并不存在制度的结构性缺失。而我国刑法对犯罪概念的界定则采用了定性加定量的分析模式,也就是说,我们在认定一个行为是否构成犯罪时,既对行为性质进行考察,同时也对其所包含的“量”进行评价,该行为是否达到一定“量”的评价对于决定其是否构成犯罪同样具有十分重要的意义。然而,这一定量限制的规定却十分原则与模糊,导致部分行为在质量互变的过程中逐渐被边缘化,而这种对边缘化违法行为调控的无序与无奈日渐凸显出了我国公法制裁体系的结构性缺陷。为了弥补这种缺陷,推进我国刑事法治化进程,本文提出通过构建一种适宜于我国司法现状的全新轻罪制裁体系——行政刑罚制度,来达到合理衔接行政罚与刑事罚的修正方案,并以此实现完善我国公法制裁体系的最终目的。 行政刑法及其制裁体系的理论研究肇始于20世纪初期的德国,之后在欧陆各国及日本得到了广泛的发展,然而,该理论被介绍到我国法学领域却只有十余年的历史,我们对这项理论系统的认识也只能说是刚刚起步,因此,对于我们大多数人来说,“行政刑法”、“行政刑罚”等术语还是相当的陌生。然而,尽管“行政刑法”这一概念从1902年始于德国学者郭特希密特的《行政刑法》(德更多还原

【Abstract】 Most Criminal Laws in the world define crime as malefaction in its nature without taking into account seriousness or consequence of the action. From police offence, misdemeanor to felony, the punishment system under public law has been operated by statutory definition of crime in concordance with judge discretion. However, China has carried out a pattern to judge crime considering both nature of the action and the effect. The seriousness or consequence plays an important role in determining whether the malefaction constitutes a crime. Nevertheless, the measurement to determine crime is too general so that some malefactions have been left to an interspace where by law would never be punished properly. For the sake of fetching up this gap and consummate China’s punishment system under public law, the author proposes the administrative punishment system - a brand new system performing as a joint of administrative sanction and criminal penalty to punish those malefactions which have been left out.Study on administrative criminal law and punishment was initiated in Germany early in last century. It was developed vastly in Europe and Japan but not had been introduced to China until a decade ago. The conception of "administrative criminal law" (Verwaltangsstara frecht in German) has been interpreted in different ways due to unacquaintance. A group of scholars believe that administrative criminal law and punishment remain in the administrative law system and equate administrative sanction; whereas another group insists administrative criminal law and punishmentrefer to a narrower scope of criminal law which punishes Mala Prohibita in particular bearing no difference from criminal penalty. However, the author holds that to introduce theory of administrative punishment into China is edificatory by any means. This thesis started with introducing the theory, compared legislation and practice of this issue in Germany and Japan, constructed a theoretic basis for a Chinese administrative punishment system and proposed a scheme of its application.更多还原