【作者】 张玉影；

【导师】 窦晓光；

【作者基本信息】 安徽大学 ， 档案学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 论文对外国政府档案信息资源管理的法规政策的发展过程、建设情况和立法特点等进行了系统的比较研究,对我国政府档案信息资源管理的法规政策建设情况进行了广泛的、背景性的分析,并从外国法规政策制定的必要性、立法原则、法规体系和方针政策等几个方面,结合我国政府档案信息资源管理法规政策建设的实际,对我国如何制定政府档案信息资源管理的法规政策进行了系统研究和学术思考。 档案与档案信息的沿革源远流长,二者是不可分割的统一体。随着信息社会的到来,信息资源成为国家重要的战略资源,国外政府信息资源的立法保护由来已久。美国是目前世界上信息立法较早、较为完备的国家,为了系统地生产、保存和管理政府档案信息资源,制定了一系列的法规政策。 中华人民共和国成立后,先后制定了一系列关于档案工作的原则和制度,逐步建立起了以机关文书为中心的政府档案信息资源管理体系。《中华人民共和国档案法》从1988年1月1日起开始施行,这是我国国家最高权力机关颁布的关于档案事业的第一部法律。从近些年来我国的政府档案信息资源管理的现状来看,只有制定相关的法规政策才能有效解决存在的制度问题和技术问题。 各国政府档案信息资源管理的法规政策的制定情况及特点各不相同,如美国、加拿大、英国、俄罗斯、日本、韩国等国家政府档案信息资源管理的法规政策,从立法模式、立法原则、关于政府档案信息的公开的内容和关于政府档案信息的安全的内容几个方面来看,各有其不同特点。 论文的研究和创新之处在于,通过对各国已制定的政府档案信息资源法规政策及其建设过程进行系统研究的基础上,结合我国政府档案信息资源管理法规政策建设的实际情况,突出地对我国政府档案信息资源管理法规政策的制定和管理立法的必要性、立法的原则、法规体系的构建、法规的内容等方面,进行了系统的思考,提出了自己的学术建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 This essay, by comparing the development process, establishment situation and the legislature characteristics of the AIRM(Archive Information Resource Management) Law-policy-making between the home and abroad, analyzes China government legislature establishment status Quo about the AIRM, and puts forward the author’s academic suggestions from the necessity, legislature principle, framing-up and content of the law-policy-making system, so as to giving consultation and reference for China’s AIRM law-making.The evolution history of archive and archive information is long and the two are inseperable entity. With the advent of information epoch, IR (information resources) is becoming a significant national strategical resource and the foreign countries’ legislature protection for the IR is long-standing. As far as this is concerned, the United States does well and for the reason of systematically producing, preserving and managing AIR(Archive Information Resources), they lay down a series of policy and law.Since the founding of People’s Republic of China, we have established the principle and institution about the archive work, gradually built the government’s AIRM system centered on the official clerks. ?The Archive Law of People’s Republic of China)) , implemented from January 1st, 1988, is the first law promulagated by China’s highest power department. From the past work experience, we can conclude only through the concerned law-making can we efficiently solve the institution and technique problems of the AIRM.Different governments have different institution and characteristics for the AIRM law-making. The U.S. , Canada, the Great Britain, Russia, Japan and Korea all manifest differently on the legislature pattern, legislature principle, the content that a government unveils and safety protection, etc.The innovation of this essay is: based on the reference from the different countries’ law-making, combined with reality about China’s AIRM, at the end , the author puts forward her personal thinking and suggestions from the necessity, legislature principle, the framing-up and content of the law-making system of the AIRM.更多还原