【作者】 阳海洪；

【导师】 唐小林；

【作者基本信息】 四川师范大学 ， 中国现当代文学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 “历史观”是现代性的一个核心概念,它把对历史的认识由外在的“天”“上帝”让渡给了人类自己,对人类的理性寄予了无限信任,由此,人类的行为都将在历史的维度上建筑自己的合法性根基。本文旨在从历史观这一角度,立足于文本分析,通过四个追问,对十七年小说进行清理,看能否找到一些被历史遗忘的密码。 第一个追问是对十七年小说的历史观的内容进行描述,从如下四个方面对文本进行概括:一、以阶级斗争为动力的革命史观;二、以共产主义理想为终极目的进步史观;三、以民粹主义思想为支撑的道德史观;四、以因果理性为思维逻辑的决定史观。十七年小说历史观由阶级斗争的动力支撑、共产主义的理想支撑、民粹主义的道德支撑、因果理性的科学支撑成为自足的体系,而这四个支撑又建筑在历史进步这一现代性观念上。在这四个支撑中,阶级斗争是最主要的支撑。通过以上的概括,为论文确立逻辑起点。 第二个追问承第一个追问而来,对十七年小说历史观的深层结构进行分析,探寻其出场的原因。论文主要从如下三个方面进行分析:一是中华民族遭遇现代性的创伤性情境,需要历史观以重建民族共同体,缓解百年来的民族焦虑;二是新的政权体制的确立,需要历史观构建合法性基础;三是在放弃了私欲这支“看不见的手”之后,需要寻找动力资源。通过语境分析,可以发现,在十七年历史观中隐含着双重的对立:在时间的认识上是空间的对立与在空间的认识是时间的对立,并且这种对立是绝对的、不可化约的。 通过对十七年小说历史观“不得不”出场的历史语境的梳理,因而对其表更多还原

【Abstract】 General view on the history of society is the core of Modernity. It changes people’s concept of human history, in which people now regard human self as decisive factor in the making of history rather than Heavens or God — once regarded as the decisive factor, which shows profound trust in human reasoning. Thus human behaviors will legally be included in the making of history. From the historical perspective, based on the-eight-novel textual analysis, this paper makes detailed inquires into novels of the seventeen years to recover something hidden in the history. The four inquiries can be specified as follows.The first is an inquiry into how to describe the view on history in novels of the seventeen years. It can be abstracted from the texts of the sample novels from the perspective of 1) the revolutionary view on history, which regards class struggle as the driving force of history; 2) the progressive view on history that takes communism for the ultimate goal of society; 3) ethical view on history, which considers Populism to be theoretical foundation; and 4) the deterministic view on history, that believes cause-and-effect to be the decisive factor in the making of history. The class struggle to be driving foundation,the communism to be ideal foundation,the populism to be ethical foundation,the cause-and-effect to be scientific foundation make up the general view on the history in the novels of seventeen years and four foundation base on the modernity view of historical progress.The class struggle to be driving foundation is the chief valuein the four foundation. This is the logical Unking throughout the paper.The second, which is closely related to the first, is an inquiry into the deep structure of the view on history embodied in novels of the Seventeen Years and how it came into being. The paper addresses this inquiry with discussion of 1) the wounded situation of the Chinese nation when encountering the modernity, which needs a view on history to rebuild the community, so as to alleviate the national anxiety over the past 100 years; 2) the establishment of the new government, which needs a view on history to lay a legal foundation; 3) searching for driving force after giving up selfish desire — an "invisible hand ". We can find the general view on the history in the novels of seventeen years imply duplicate contrast by analyzing the novels’ context:understanding in time is space contrast and understanding in space is time contrast the contrast is absolute.The third inquiry is into the "history progression" — basic values in the view on history embodied in novels of the seventeen years. After analysis and synthesis of the historical linguistic context, which produced and forced the view on history reflected in novels of Seventeen Years, the researcher developed sympathy for the situation. However, sympathy cannot stop further reflection on the issue, which is embodied in the third inquiry. It is addressed to textual contradictions, and trace of the erased intertwisted, to analyze the three propositions "truth and progress", "radicalism and progress", and "morality and progress", so as to show that the view on history reflected in novels of the Seventeen Years can be proved wrong.lt suction out the history when it becomes a absolute view.Influence of a view can only be destroyed by another influential view. Only a novel idea can disintegrate and deconstruct the old one. The fourth is the inquiry into the view on history literature needs and the paper points to two directions of thinking: one is harmonious but varied view on history, the other is humanistic view on history.更多还原