【作者】 严志健；

【导师】 牟逍媛；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 诉讼法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 民事诉讼旨在定纷止争,民事法官的职责在于解决纠纷,他们有责任合法、合理的审理案件、做出判决;证据是促成法官作出尽可能合理、正确的判决的关键因素。在现代民事诉讼中,当事人具有举证的权利,同时也有举证的义务。法官则具有是否采信证据的权力,同时也有合理阐明认证、采信证据理由的义务。随着人类知识的疾速扩展,越来越多的领域已经超越当事人及其代理人以及法官的认知范围,他们对诸多的专门性知识缺少了解,甚至茫然无知。在这种情况下,当事人如何行使举证的权利、如何履行举证的义务,法官如何行使取舍证据的权力、如何履行释明取舍证据理由的义务,都将成为不容回避的重大问题,冲突已经出现。如果无法构建公正合理、具有适当效率的审理架构,那么将会有越来越多的案件得不到及时、合理的审判。在此情境下,科学技术人员介入民事诉讼确属不可避免且程度渐深。我国大陆现有民事诉讼体系对于技术性力量参与并促进诉讼顺利进行的认识尚存在不足,表现为抱残守缺、企图通过对现有鉴定结论制度的修补以缓解冲突;新出台的司法解释中具有专门性知识人员出庭的制度也不尽完善。本文试图分析、评价专家进入民事诉讼的理论基础以及实务运作,此处的专家将具有具有全新内涵和外延;继而研讨在中国大陆建立突破以往框架的专家证人制度,使得审判权与专业技术有机结合,促使法官获得更准确的信息,促使当事人获得更广泛、积极的诉讼参与能力,促使判决在更接近事实的基础上具有更多的合理性与可接受性。本文对专家证人的具体运作,包括专家证人的身份认定、出庭程序、费用承担、专家证言的采信等,提出建设性建议。本文认识更多还原

【Abstract】 The Civil Procedure aims to resolve disputes. The evidence is the key factor which helps the Judge make reasonable and correct judgment. With the human being knowing more and more knowledge in widespread fields, many information has exceeded the range of Judge’s brain. It’s inevitable that the expert participate in the Civil Procedure, and the participation has been more and more deeper. The present Civil Procedure system in China’s mainland doesn’t have enough perspective concerning the expert attending and thereby promoting the procedure. The article attempts to analyze and evaluate the theory foundation and factual operation of the expert witness, and further to discuss how to break through the old system and to establish the expert witness system. The system we want to establish will integrate the Judicial and the Professional Scientific resource successfully, make the Judge get more correct information, strengthen the procedure parties participation ability, and finally make the judgment more reasonable and acceptable.更多还原