【作者】 陈蓉；

【导师】 唐超华；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 民商法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 合理使用制度是著作权理论的黄油和面包。而平衡精神是合理使用制度的立法动因。网络技术的发展与著作权合理使用制度之间存在着巨大冲突。传统的著作权合理使用制度在此背景下面临着诸多尴尬。没有合理使用制度,著作权法也就没有存在的必要。为了保持作者、使用者、社会公众之间利益的平衡,有必要深入研究合理使用制度理论,完善我国网络环境下著作权合理使用法律制度,促进我国科学文化事业的发展。这不仅具有理论意义,更具有紧迫的现实意义。 网络环境下著作权合理使用是指在法律规定的条件下,不必征得著作权人的同意,又不必向其支付报酬,基于正当目的而使用他人著作权作品的合法行为。网络环境下合理使用不是使用者的一项民事权利,而是对著作权人主张著作权的一种限制。我国著作权采用列举方式明确规定合理使用的事项。网络环境下,这一判断标准已很难适用。因此,网络环境下我国著作权合理使用的判断标准,可以在传统模式基础之上,借鉴美国著作权合理使用的判断标准来判断使用者的行为是否属于合理使用。 网络环境下,关于著作权合理使用范围的争论非常激烈。从国际与各国的立法看,合理使用的范围则呈缩减趋势;从技术措施被利用的角度看,合理使用的范围受到限制。但这并不意味着在此背景下,合理使用制度没有存在的必要了。从法哲学、宪法学、经济学的角度看,合理使用制度仍有存在的价值。那么,相对于著作权人权利的扩张,合理使用的范围也应相应得到扩展。 网络环境下著作权权合理使用制度存在许多新问题,其中典型的是个人使用、数字图书馆、远程教学、技术保护措施与合理使用之间的冲突。通过分析现行著作权合理使用的不足,提出了完善网络环境下著作权合理使用制度的立法和司法的具体建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Fair use is the butter and the bread of copyright. However, balance spirit is the legislation motive of fair use. There are enormous conflicts between the development of the network technology and fair use in copyright. The traditional fair use in copyright faces a great deal of awkwardness under this background. If there is no fair use, it is not necessary for copyright to exist, either. It is essential to make further research on the theory of fair use to balance the benefit among the author, the user and the public, perfect fair use in copyright and promote the development of science and culture cause, which not only has a theoretical meaning, but also an urgent realistic meaning even more.Fair use in copyright, under the network environment, means a lawful behavior that in the conditions defined by the law, a work may be used without permission from, and without payment of remuneration to, the copyright owner, based on appropriate purpose. Fair use under the network environment is not one of the rights for the users, but one of the restrictions for the copyright owners to contend their rights. Enumeration mode is adopted in the copyright to definitely define the fair use. The current judgment criterion of fair use is not applicable to the network environment. Therefore, the judgment criterion, may be referred to the criterion of America to judge whether the behavior of the users belongs to fair use. The dispute on the range of fair use in copyright is extremely intense. In accordance with the international and the other countries’ legislation, the range of fair use has a tendency to reduce; according to an angle that technological protective measure is utilized, the range of fair use is restricted. But it doesn’t mean that it is not necessary for fair use to exist under the network environment. In terms of law philosophy, constitution and economics, fair use still has the value to exist under the network environment. However, the range of fair use should be expanded correspondingly with the expansion of the copyright owner’s rights.Under the network environment, fair use has a lot of new problems. The conflicts between personal use, digital library, long-distance education, technological protective measure and fair use is the most representative problems. Through analyzing the defect of fair use in the current copyright law under the network environment, it is put forward a concrete legislative and judicial proposal that regulate and perfect fair use in copyright under the network environment.Key Words: Network environment; Copyright; System of fair use; Suggestion更多还原