【作者】 张自国；

【导师】 唐超华；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 民商法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 随着知识经济的兴起和迅猛发展,商业秘密保护方法作为技术进步保护的最前沿,越来越受到企业的重视和青睐。中国企业在走向市场的过程中,逐渐意识到商业秘密保护的重要性。但是在实践中,商业秘密的保护存在很多问题,导致保护不力,存在巨大商业价值的商业秘密被轻易泄漏,给企业和国家造成了严重的经济损失。国家在意识到该问题严重性的同时,在立法上采取了大量的有效措施来保护我国的商业秘密,但是由于对该问题研究不够深入,理论和实践准备不足,目前商业秘密保护状况仍不尽如人意。因此我国如何在立法上保护商业秘密成了目前必须要解决的重要课题。借鉴发达国家成熟的立法经验是在短期内建立商业秘密保护体系的必由之路。在发达国家中美国对商业秘密的保护走在了世界的前列,不论是其保护理念,还是保护的具体措施,都值得学习和研究。中国目前立法主要受到大陆法系国家的影响,特别是德国和日本,而对英美法系的法律文明借鉴较少,在目前研究的论文以及有关著作中专门对美国商业秘密法律保护的研究也不多见。本文正是在这种背景下对中美商业秘密法律保护进行了比较研究,希望有益于中国商业秘密立法和中国商业秘密保护。 本文首先归纳了两国在商业秘密保护上的立法现状。其次对商业秘密的概念、构成要件和范围等基本理论问题进行了比较探讨。然后在商业秘密的保护理论上,探讨了美国存在着各种保护理论。美国在这些理论的研究上有比中国更加突出的优势,他们的市场经济十分发达,为他们的研究提供了丰富的研究素材,加上他们灵活的司法体系,各种理论都能够运用到法律实践中去。我国商业秘密保护的研究主要借鉴日本、韩国等周边国家的理论和实践,强调以反不正当竞争的手段来解决侵犯商业秘密权的问题。忽视对其他理论的深入研究,使得我国商业秘密保护研究方式单一,立法松散,解决问题的措施简单。本文强调综合运用多种理论来指导实践,为商业秘密的保护提供严密的保护网络。次后在救济方面对商业秘密保护问题进行了探讨。美国强调严格的民事保护,辅之以刑法威慑;而我国强调以行政手段为基本救济手段,忽视民事救济。基于上述比较,最后得出五点总结,希望有益于我国《商业秘密保护法》立法与实践。更多还原

【Abstract】 With knowledge economy arising and developing rapidly, trade secret protection, one of the most popular means of technology protection, is cherished by more and more corporations. Chinese corporations have come to realize the importance of the protection of trade secret in the process of marketrization. But, in practice, there exist a lot of troubles in trade secret protection. For example there are a number of trade secrets are let on which lead to serious economic damages to the corporations and our country. Fortunately our governments have realized the serious situation, so they have taken numerously effective methods to defend trade secret. However, the situation of protection is not as good as plan, because the trade secret protection both in theory and practice are not enough. So deep research is a most necessary issue for trade secret protection. It is an effective path that builds a trade secret protection system by using legislation experience of developed countries. America, one of the developed countries, runs the first in the world about trade secret protection. Both its practical theory and the methods are worth studying and using. At present, we think highly of civil-law countries’ law civilization, especially Germany and Japan, while ignoring the civilization of common-law countries, which resulting to no abundant and systematic research results to American trade secret protection in nowdays articles and works. Under this situation, my paper researches the trade secret protection both in America and China by contrast and I hope it can do benefit to our country’s trade secret protection legislation and judiciary.At first, the paper summarizes the legislation of trade secret protection, then, analyses the basic theory about the trade secret concept, inscape, and scope by contrast, and then, argues all kinds of theories of trade secret protection. In these theories, America takes the various advantages than China, because of American advanced market-oriental economy, which offer them abundant research materials and of their flexible judiciary system, which can make all kinds of theories into judiciary practice. Our country, mainly uses Japanese and Korea trade secret protection theory and practice for reference, which mainly stress on anti-unfair competition to solve trade secret invasion. Ignoring other theories research, lead to our country’s trade secret protection methods of research dull, legislation system loose and the means of solution simple. The paper appeals for using various different theories to conduct practice, and then offers a complete web to protect trade secret. The forth part that更多还原