【作者】 师文兵；

【导师】 乔瑞金；

【作者基本信息】 山西大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 英国历史主义的马克思主义和结构主义的马克思主义是当代西方两个颇具影响的新马克思主义学派。汤普森和安德森分别是这两个学派的代表人物。在学术研究当中,两学派都继承了马克思的批判精神,并在马克思主义的理论基础上,主要从文化层面展开对历史与现实的审视。历史主义的马克思主义学派的成员多是一些著名的历史学家。他们继承了英国的经验主义传统,重视历史事实和经验材料,强调人的主观意识和能动性。结构主义的马克思主义的成员多是上个世纪60年代加入《新左派评论》杂志的编辑。在进口欧洲大陆理论的过程中,他们自觉地对这些理论,尤其对法国结构主义理论进行了批判和继承。同时他们也不自觉地受到欧洲大陆唯理论传统的影响,多重视理论建构,主张从整体对社会发展进行把握。此外,由于《新左派评论》杂志一直是引领欧美左派理论和运动的旗帜,因此结构主义的马克思主义学派又表现出强烈的理论与实践相结合的意识。由于以上原因造成两派观点分歧严重,从上个世纪60年代起就开始了旷日持久的争论。最终两派从争论走向了对话,实现了在马克思主义体系内的结合。本文主要对汤普森和安德森这两个代表人物的理论争锋和交流进行梳理与分析,以求从中管窥两个学派的学术特点和发展脉络,同时为我们正确认识马克思主义提供借鉴。更多还原

【Abstract】 Historicist Marxism and Structuralist Marxism in England are two famous current Western New Marxism doctrine schools. The representative personages of the two schools are separately Edward Thompson and Perry Anderson. In the research, two schools succeeded the repudiating spirit of Marxism, and studied the history and present through the culture plane on Marxism fundamental rule. The most members of Historicist Marxism are famous historians. Have succeeded the empiricism tradition in England, They valued history fact and the experience stuff, and emphasized man’s subjective consciousness and dynamic role. The most of members of the Structuralist Marxism are the editors of New Left Review, who mostly joined in the magazine in the 1960’s. In the Process of importing Europe mainland theories to England, they were willingly to repudiate and succeed these theories, especially French structuralism theory. At the same time, the Europe mainland rationalism tradition had an unaware effect on them, so that they valued theory constructing even more, and argued that it is important to hold the community entirely. Moreover, since the fact that New Left Review is always the banner which guide the left theory and mass movement in Europe and America, the Structuralist Marxism has been having the strong consciousness to combine theory with practice. The two schools have diverged of the views seriously since 1960’s and debated over a long time. Finally, the conversation has been holding between the two schools through the debate, and they integrated themselves into Marxism. The main role of this thesis is to arrange and analyze the theory debate and conversation between Thompson and Anderson. It is helpful to us to inquire into the learning distinguishing feature and the development venation of the two schools. And it can supply the reference in the process of our understanding Marxism correctly.更多还原