【作者】 陈敏；

【导师】 汪渊智；

【作者基本信息】 山西大学 ， 民商法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 民法时效制度包括取得时效和消灭时效两个方面,自罗马法以来,各国民法莫不承认。在我国,民法学界长期的否定态度使取得时效制度在立法上一度销声匿迹。然而,随着市场经济的发展与民法制度的完善,目前,学者对于这一制度的意义已形成共识,在《中国物权法草案建议稿》和《中国民法典总则编(条文建议稿)》中均有所涉及,但如何将这一制度妥善移植于独具中国特色的物权制度中,仍有许多问题值得深入研究。本文拟对取得时效制度的几个基本问题进行较为全面地论述,并针对《中国民法典总则编(条文建议稿)》关于取得时效的规定提出若干完善建议,以期对我国民法时效制度的完善稍有助益。 文章第一部分探索了取得时效制度产生和发展的历史进程,并对许多国家民法规定的情况进行了比较研究,以期从整体上把握其发生、发展的规律及未来趋势。 文章第二部分主要论述了取得时效制度的存在价值。取得时效具有保护所有权的机能,取得时效是维护交易安全的重要手段,取得时效与消灭时效构成完整的时效体系,善意取得制度和登记制度不能取代取得时效制度,取得时效在我国有存在的必要性。 文章第三部分谈了取得时效的构成要件。主要是占有和经过一定期间,善意并非必要条件,而仅作为影响时效进程的因素考虑。 文章第四部分讨论了取得时效的适用范围。随着历史的演进,取得时效的适用范围呈不断扩张之趋势,从最初的所有权扩张至所有权更多还原

【Abstract】 The prescription system includes acquisitive prescription and extinctive prescription, which originated from the ancient Roman law, and has been followed by most countries and areas. In our country, acquisitive prescription has not been admitted for a long time. But now, with the development of market economy and the consummation of civil law institution, scholars have recognized the significance of acquisitive prescription and it has been involved in the drafts of Real Right Law and Civil Code. While a lot of problems about acquisitive prescription are worth further researching. This article is going to discuss several basic problems of acquisitive prescription deeply and provide some advices to the draft of Civil Code.The first part of the article explores the history of acquisitive prescription and compares the stipulations of that in different countries. Thus, we can grasp the regularity of acquisitive prescription.The second part of the article expounds the existence value of acquisitive prescription. It has the function of protecting ownership. It is the important means to safeguard the transaction safety. It forms the integrated prescription system with extinctive prescription. It can not be replaced by acquisition in good faith and registration system. It is necessary to build it in our country.The third part of the article discusses the essential elements of acquisitive prescription. They are mainly possession and passing the statutory period. Good faith is not necessary, but it can influence the procession of acquisitive prescription.The fourth part of the article discusses the scope of application. With the progress of history, the scope of application tends to expand. Ownership, usufruct of immovable property, real right guaranteed and incorporeal property rights are mainly discussed here.The fifth part of the article mainly discusses the legal effect of acquisitive prescription from three respects: effect, assertion and the更多还原