【作者】 江博；

【导师】 姚锐敏；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 行政管理， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 听证,目前已成为各国行政程序法一项共同的且颇具重要意义的制度。我国自1996年颁布的《行政处罚法》正式引入听证程序以来,听证已成为提高行政能力的一种不可或缺的手段,听证活动开始逐步走入了广大人民群众的生活之中。从不知听证到参与听证,它带来了公众参与法制建设的观念变革;从举办听证会到为听证会提供制度保障,它体现了我国民主向高层次的提升。长期以来,不少政府部门习惯于关门做决策,不容百姓置疑;听证,作为听取社会意见的一种方式和程序,将改变这种状况。尽管如此,听证程序在中国运用还处于初级阶段,听证会还只是给公民提供了一个表达意见的机会,并不一定影响政策和法律制定的过程及结果。随着听证的引入,如何扩大完善我国听证制度,监督行政权力的行使,正成为社会各界关注的焦点。 本文以我国政治、经济、社会领域的变革为背景,以马克思“一切从实际出发,事实求是”的思想路线和邓小平理论,“三个代表”重要思想以及科学发展观为指导,运用规范分析法、文献分析法等相关理论手段,从听证制度产生的必然性和合理性入手,分析我国现行听证制度存在的问题和产生的原因,探讨健全和完善我国听证制度的路径和对策。本文按照“提出问题、分析问题、解决问题”的思路,分为四个部分: 文章的第一部分首先分析了听证(Public Hearing)的基本概念,然后讨论了听证制度的产生、发展和我国引入听证制度的历史过程。 文章的第二部分讨论了我国引入听证制度的必然性与合理性,一方面介绍了我国引入听证制度的社会宏观背景,另一方面阐述了我国引入听证制度的现实意义。 文章的第三部分着重提出了我国听证制度的几个方面的局限性:①公民参与听证的局限;②听证程序的局限;③利益救济方面的局限,并对每一类局限的出现做出了自己的分析和理解。 文章的第四部分探讨了完善我国听证制度的路径与措施,具体包括①进一更多还原

【Abstract】 The public hearing has already become a common system of having much important meanings of administrative procedure laws of various countries at present. Our country "administrative penalty law" that issue lead into hearing procedure begin formally 1996, the hearing has already become a kind of indispensable means to improve administrative ability. The hearing activity has already begun to enter into the broad masses of the people’s life progressively. Never know the hearing gets the hearing of participating in, it brings the public’s idea of participating in legal construction to improve; from the hearing of holding to designing the system to ensure for the hearing, it has reflected the democracy of our country is promoted to high level. For a long time, many government departments get used to closing decision , does not allow common people to doubt; The hearing, as listening to a way and procedure on the social suggestion, will change this kind of state. Even so, hearing procedure is it at primary stage also to use in China, hearing to provide one chance, expression of suggestion for citizen also, might not influence course and result that the policy and law are made. With introduction of the hearing, how to expand and perfect the system of hearing of our country, in order to supervise the enforcement of administrative power, become the focus that the various circles of society are paying close attention to.This text changes leather into the background in China’s political, economic , social field, everything proceeds from the reality with Marx, fact Seeking Truth thought route and the Deng Xiaoping Theory, have the important in ’Three Represents’ Jiang Zemin thought, the Hu Jintao scientific development view, as guidance of, is it standardize analytic approach , document analytic approach ,etc. relevant theory means start with from hearing certainty and rationality that system produce to use, analyze current situation and reason of production of question these ,attempt through is it is it analyze and solve breach and countermeasure of problem of these to find to analyze. This text, according to the thinking of "proposing the problem, analyzing the problem, solving the problem", divided into four parts:The first part of the article has put forward different countries , scholar to different understanding holding court at first, point out this text involves the basic conception that Public Hearing ; Secondly, the formulation , development and course of introducing and launching in our country of the system that have discussed and held court.Have discussed our country introduce the certainty and rationality of the hearing system with the second part of the article, on one hand has recommended our country to introduce the social macroscopically background of the hearing system, have explained on the other hand our country introduces the realistic meaning of the hearing system.The third part of the article has proposed the limitation of several respects of the system of hearing of our country emphatically: ?The citizen participates in the limitation that public hearing ; ?Limitation of the hearing procedure ; ?Relieve the limitation of the respect, making one’s own analysis about appearance of every kind of limitation and understanding in interests.The fourth part of the article and the third part are key contents of the full text in the lump, to several question that previous part appear, this text this part direct against every kind of question, put forward corresponding countermeasure think , including① expand the scope of application of the hearing further one by one; ② Range expanding the hearing and participating in people further; ③Establish and improve system of hearing host; ④Confirm the effect put down in hearing; ⑤Give the decision effect with real hearing; ?Perfect the open information system, ensure the realization of the hearing right; ⑦Perfect relevant relief systems.The innovation of this text shows: Proceed from macroscopically aspect of the society at first, has analyzed, probed into the social certainty that the system produces of public hearing, and according to hold court function and realistic更多还原