节点文献
1914-2000年的“教育概论”教科书
Pedagogic Textbooks of "Foundations of Education"
【作者】 陈志萍;
【导师】 董标;
【作者基本信息】 华南师范大学 , 教育学原理, 2005, 硕士
【副题名】回顾与反思
【摘要】 本文对1914——2000年我国学者自编的教育学教科书进行个案分析,从分析、比较民国时期和现代教育学教科书的角度对我国教育学进行回顾。在此基础上,探究以上两个时期的教科书在框架体系、内容构成、“教育”概念分析等方面有何关联,并从政治背景对教育学教科书编写的影响、教育学教科书与教育学研究之间的关系两方面对教育学教科书进行反思。 从我国教育学教科书编撰的历程中,可以看出:教育学教科书的编写受社会政治背景的影响和制约,教育学教科书在一定程度上反映了我国社会的政治意识形态;教育学教科书的编写不能等同于教育学研究,作为教育学研究主体的教育工作者,有必要从思想方法和对科学发展逻辑的认识上去反思教育学的发展。
【Abstract】 This paper uses the way of giving a specific example to analysis the pedagogic textbooks from 1914 to 2000 which are compiled by Chinese educationists, and reviews the evolution of the pedagogic textbooks of 1914-2000 by analyzing and comparing the pedagogic textbooks of Nationalist China with that of modern times. On this basis, this paper explores the relationship of frame, content composing and analysis of the concept of "education" between two periods ’s pedagogy textbooks, and retrospects the evolution of the pedagogic textbooks from the influence of politics background on pedagogic textbooks and the relation between the pedagogic textbooks and pedagogic research.It can be discovered from the evolution of the compiling of pedagogic textbooks: the background of social politics influenced and restricted the compiling of pedagogic textbooks; the pedagogic textbooks reflected social politics ideology to a certain extent . The compiling of pedagogic textbooks and pedagogic research are different. Educationalists who are the main body of pedagogic research need to retrospect the evolution of pedagogy from the thinking way and cognition of the logic of science development.
【Key words】 Pedagogy; Foundations of education; Textbooks; Review; Retrospect;
- 【网络出版投稿人】 华南师范大学 【网络出版年期】2005年 07期
- 【分类号】G40
- 【被引频次】6
- 【下载频次】426