论我国《对外贸易法》中反规避法律的完善

【作者】 张金鑫；

【导师】 焦志勇；

【作者基本信息】 首都经济贸易大学 ， 经济法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 反规避措施是反倾销措施的延伸和深化,反规避立法是反倾销立法的补充和发展。 虽然,在2004年7月1日实施的《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》(以下简称《外贸法》)第一次在法律层面上提及规避与反规避行为,但也只是在第37条第四款与第五十条中简单予以涉及,只能起到一定的指导作用,并不能有效的控制与制裁规避行为。即便加上2002年1月1日施行的《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》中第35条和2003年1月15日开始实施的《反倾销产业损害调查与裁决规定》中第五章所涉及的规避与反规避规定,也不能真正解决日益猖獗的规避行为,这势必会使我国国内产业与公平的对外贸易体系受到损害。正因为如此,笔者选取了完善《外贸法》中反规避法律这一热点问题加以探讨。 在研究方法上,通过对欧盟、美国、GATT等国家(地区)的相关立法进行比较分析,从一个更高的角度来审视《外贸法》中关于反规避法律的规定,认为我国《外贸法》中反规避法律规定不能单纯照搬外国模式,而要根据我们具体国情加以完善。在研究内容方面,在详述了外国相关法律规定的基础上,重点从我国反规避立法的必要性、立法原则、实体法规范、程序法规范等角度全面阐诉了笔者关于完善《外贸法》中反规避法律制度的想法与论点。更多还原

【Abstract】 Along with customs duty decreasing and the non- tariff barrier’s limited use, gradually becomes the one kind of important non- customs duty trade measure that various countries use to prevent or stop dump behavior, and to protect home industry. Therefore, various countries revise and consummate legal system. Our country’s legislation and practice start quite late, and experienced the difficult course form frequently suffered antidumping indictment, passive answer to crack down on overseas dump initiatively. In order to take better sue and sanction, China started the antidumping legislation practice in 1994.In recent years, our country’s antidumping legislation and practice has made very big progress. The government unceasingly takes the measure to instruct the enterprises. The enterprises’ consciousness about answering sue and vindicating right unceasingly strengthens. In international circumstance that under the increasingly fierce struggle between dumps and antidumping, evading and anti-evading .On the one hand, various governments unceasing revise antidumping legislation, expanded its use scope, strengthens its potency, and protects their own industry’s benefit and development; On the other hand, various countries’ exporter unceasingly transforms the dump method , adopts many kinds of evading measure to evade the countries’ antidumping measure. In the contest, anti-evading legislation is produced and consummated day by day. It can be said that, anti-evading measure is extending and deepening of antidumping measure, anti-evading legislation is supplement and the development of antidumping legislation.But regrettably, anti-evading has not been brought to our enough attention in our country. At present very few people in our country involve this question in their research, moreover they are merely limited in the foreign law simple introduction. In view of this, the author although deeply feels has little talent and learning, still with great courage to carry on the analysis and research with the front question of anti-evading in antidumping domain .By offering a few introductory remarks, I wish others may offer their valuable ideas, to contribute to our country’s anti-evading legislation.This article analyze and introduce the development, present situation and application practice situation of evading legislation, and tries to carry on the comparison and the appraisal of European Union, US, GATT anti-evading legal framework. On this foundation, the author proposed some idea and the suggestionabout our country’s anti-evading legislation from angles of legislation principle, substantive law standard, procedural law standard and so on.更多还原