试论仲裁裁决的撤销

【作者】 李琳；

【导师】 杨秀清；

【作者基本信息】 中国政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 当今,我国市场经济日趋发达,各种民事主体之间的经济往来日益频繁,各种经济纠纷也层出不穷,仲裁作为与诉讼并列的一种纠纷解决方式正因其高效和迅速的特点而日益发挥出重要的作用。仲裁与诉讼的关系也逐渐成为大家关注的焦点,特别是其中的“司法应该在多大程度上干预仲裁的过程和结果”这一问题更是成为核心问题。撤销仲裁裁决制度是司法干预仲裁的重要表现形式,但是在我国,该制度的研究至今仍不完善,导致现实中法院审理撤销仲裁裁决案件没有具体审理程序可以依照,因此实践中存在许多问题,亟待解决。本文主要从以下四个部分展开论述。 第一部分为提出问题部分,阐述了我国撤销仲裁裁决制度理论和现实中存在的问题。首先介绍了撤销仲裁裁决制度的基本理论,然后对我国当前的立法中关于撤销仲裁裁决制度的规定以及这些规定导致现实操作中存在的问题进行了介绍,从而说明撤销仲裁裁决制度研究的必要性和紧迫性。最后,从两个不同的角度——基本理念视角和实践操作视角深刻分析了所存在的问题的性质,为后文对问题根源的分析打下基础。 第二部分为分析问题部分,分析了前述问题存在的根源并从根本上对撤销仲裁裁决制度中导致问题存在的思想和理论基础进行了修正,从而为后文具体程序的架构奠定了新的价值基础。文章在本部分首先概括介绍了撤销仲裁裁决制度的价值,肯定了对于撤销仲裁裁决制度进行研究和完善的必要,然后介绍了我国学术界所认为的撤销仲裁裁决制度的传统价值并论述了这种不合理的价值基础正是导致立法和实践中出现很多问题的原因,提出为了根本解决这些问题必须对传统价值进行修正的观点,认为应该以新的价值观——法院监督与对当事人权利救济兼顾的价值观作为指导,在此基础上构建我国具体的撤销仲裁裁决案件的审理程序。 第三部分是从理论上对于撤销仲裁裁决制度进行分析,为后文撤销仲裁裁决具体程序的架构提供理论支持。文章从两个角度为下一部分具体程序的构建提供支持:一方面,基本理论角度。文章对民事诉讼中的基本理论——诉、形成之诉和程序上形成之诉等进行了介绍和梳理,论证了应该确立撤销仲裁裁决之诉的理更多还原

【Abstract】 Nowadays, the market-economy in our country develops more and more quickly and the economic contacts among all kinds of the civil subjects increase, so there are more and more disputes which appear. As a resolution to those disputes which has the same function as the lawsuit, the arbitration becomes more and more important because of its quickness and efficiency. The relationship between the arbitration and the lawsuit becomes the focus which people pay attention to, especially that the problem how deeply the justice will intervene the result and the procedure of the arbitration becomes the most important. The reversal of the arbitration judgment is the important means by which the justice influences the arbitration, but in our country, the study of this system isn’t perfect at all, which induces the finals the courts haven’t any appropriate procedures they can follow when they hear this kind of cases and there are a lot of puzzles in reality which are in need of resolutions. This article mainly discusses this problem in four parts: The first part is the one to put forward the problem, which discusses the theory of the reversal of the arbitration judgment and the reality in our country. Then it introduces the rules of the reversal of the arbitration judgment in China and the problems which the rules induce, in order to express the idea that the study of this problem is very necessary and pressing. Finally, this part analyses the character of the problems from two angles------basic theory and real practice, which build the foundation for the discussion about the reason for the problem. The second part is the one which analyses the problem. It analyses the reason and modifies the thought and theoretical foundation which induce the problems in the reversal of the arbitration judgment. The article introduces the value of this system in this part firstly and the author believes that it is very necessary to study and modify this system, then it introduces the traditional value our professors consider and discusses and analyses that it is because of this unreasonable value foundation that there appear lots of problems in reality. The author insists we must modify the classic value foundation and make as the guidance the new idea of value that pays the same attention to court inspection and the relief to the parties’ rights, on which foundation building the procedure for the reversal of the arbitration judgment in our country. The third part analyses the reversal system of the arbitration judgment in the theory in order to give the support to the building of the material procedures. This part supports the latter from two perspectives: on one hand, the theoretical perspective. The article introduces the basic theories in the civil procedural law and discusses the idea to construct the sue of the reversal of the arbitration judgment and its character is the formation sue of the procedural law, so it gives the theoretical base to the construction of the material procedures in the fourth part. Then, the article introduces the point of the contractization of litigation and uses this theory to balance the justice and efficiency when we use the two-tiered system to have the case of the reversal of the arbitration judgment on trial. On the other hand, the perspective to refer to the foreign countries and areas. The article discusses the law rules prescribed in UK, USA, Germany, Japan, France and Taiwan district of China, etc. It mainly discusses six problems as follows: (1) the rules of the procedures the courts use to put this kind of cases on trial; (2) the rules of jurisdictional court; (3) the rules of the parties; (4) the rules of the appeal the justice relief; (5) the rules of the time limit of application; (6) the rules of the courts’ hearing method and inspecting area in this kind of cases. The fourth part is to resolve the problem. The article reconstructs the reversal of the arbitration judgment in our country from two perspectives: the material procedures by which the courts hear this kind of cases and the condi更多还原