【作者】 张华；

【导师】 吕彦；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 法律， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 信赖利益是合同法上的一项重要利益形态，是法律基于诚实信用原则，为保护交易安全所作的特别规定。我国学界目前对信赖利益的研究，尚显薄弱。本文在借鉴各国研究成果，尤其是大陆法系国家研究成果的基础上，立足我国合同法的相关规定，围绕信赖利益的三个核心问题，即什么是信赖利益、信赖利益的赔偿范围有多大以及在何种场合下适用信赖利益，对信赖利益进行了较为深入系统的研究。 首先是绪论。在绪论中，本文首先从经济生活的角度指出信赖是商品交易中不可或缺的重要因素，法律作为经济的反映，必然会规定相关制度以保护信赖。随后，本文分别对英美法系和大陆法系的信赖与信赖利益问题作了历史考察。并在最后对研究信赖利益的意义和方法作了说明。 第一部分为信赖利益定义解析。在第一部分中，本文介绍了有关信赖利益的各种定义以及我国学仁对信赖利益传统定义的批判，接着从信赖利益的根据、信赖利益与信赖的关系、信赖利益的构成要件等方面对信赖利益作了较为系统的说明。 第二部分为信赖利益与相关概念之比较。在该部分中，本文分别比较了信赖利益与缔约过失责任、信赖利益与维持利益和履行利益、信赖利益与返还利益和期待利益以及信赖利益与信赖规则的同时，对信赖利益作了更明确的界定。 第一部分和第二部分主要在于解决什么是信赖利益的问题。 第三部分为信赖利益的赔偿范围。在该部分中，本文首先讨论了信赖利益与交易风险，以明确信赖利益是否应予赔偿；其次分析了财产上损害的范围和限制：再次分析了损害赔偿中的损益相抵与过失相抵问题；最后讨论了信赖利益是否以履行利益为限。 第四部分为信赖利益的具体适用形态，亦即信赖利益的适用场合。在该部分中，本文分别讨论了要约撤销、缔约上过失、效力未定合同被撤销或拒绝追认、合同被解除等以及赠与合同中的信赖利益损害赔偿问题。关键词:信赖信赖利益合同法更多还原

【Abstract】 As one type of the beneficial enjoyment upon contract importantly, reliance interest is provided by the law-maker according to the principle of fidelity and credit for the purpose of the security of transaction. Yet, it seems that the research of it needs lots of efforts for us to resume at this stage. In reference to the work-pieces abroad, especially the outcome from the researchers of the Continental Legal System, this article on the basis of the provisions of native contract-law, has systematically made a careful research of the affairs about reliance interest, with exposition -of such key aspects as the nature/scope and exercise of it.In the part of preface, the author points out that reliance is a necessary element in business transaction and the legislature, reflecting the rule of economy, shall enact corresponding acts to regulate it. Then, by comparison of the items of reliance and reliance interest between the system of civil law and system of common law, an illustration of the meaning and method is introduced in the principal body of this article. Section one focuses on the definition of reliance interest. In which, a diversity of the views is cited, and that the traditional conception was criticized by the native academy is commented too. Following that, some questions about the cause of the reliance interest, the relation between reliance interest and reliance and the constitutional requirements are talked about clearly.Section two is the comparison between reliance interest and relevant concepts. Here, the author try to compare the reliance interest with the culpa de negotiation the reliance interest with the contract-uphold benefit (or: the contract-maintain benefit)and the performance benefit, the reliance interest with the returning benefit and the promised benefit, and the reliance interest with the rule of reliance, with the intention to specifically define the reliance interest.The aim of section one and two is mainly about what the reliable benefit is. Section three involves the scope of reliance interest. The reliance interest and the transaction risk are discussed firstly, in order to be certain about the compensation of it. Then the author makes analysis about the scope and limit of the detriment, and explores the problems of offset about damages and negligence. The discussion of whether the reliance interest should be limited within the range of performance benefit is covered at the end of this section.Section four describes the specific circumstances, wherein the reliance interest can be claimed. In this section, the problems about compensation to the reliance interest arising from the situations of cancellation of an offer, culpa de negotiation, rescission or refusal of an inauthentic contract, release of a contract and te presentation contract are discussed respectively.更多还原