【作者】 李芳；

【导师】 周啸天；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 《古文苑》是一部很重要的诗文总集，其中收录了从东周到南朝齐间的二百六十余篇诗文，都不见于史传和《文选》，因此在保存汉魏六朝文学史料、辑佚、校勘等方面有重要的价值。南宋、明、清时期的文人在整理作家别集或编纂诗文总集时多参考此书。在清代严可均所编的《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文》中，有许多文章就直接录自于《古文苑》。 但是《古文苑》一书又存在很多问题和疑点。例如，正史中的《艺文志》从没有著录过此书，早期著录它的都是私家目录书，而最早的著录文字也没有提到其成书年代和编纂人，只知道它是在北宋年间被孙洙发现的，据称是唐代人所编。这种说法没有充足的证据，因此后人对此多持怀疑态度。但是由于相关资料匮乏，或者是对这本书不太重视等种种原因，后代学者大多沿用旧说。一直到清《四库全书总目》都还是这种观点。《古文苑》成书年代不详，编纂人也不知为谁，因此就有一些学者认为它是伪书，对于其中所收录的诗文也持怀疑态度，认为有一些诗文根本不是汉魏人的作品，而是后人伪造的。 由于《古文苑》中所收录的作品多有讹误、残缺，《四库全书总目》认为《古文苑》里的作品乃是缀辑唐代类书《艺文类聚》和《初学记》中的文字而成，这就更加降低了《古文苑》的价值和它在学者心目中的地位。以至于至今对它进行研究的人仍寥寥无几，相关的研究成果也很缺乏。 鉴于以上种种情况，本篇论文就从《古文苑》的成书年代这个问题入手，根据其中所收录的具体作品的体裁、内容和文本，来综合考证它的成书年代，分析它的编纂体例和宗旨。因为《古文苑》与《文选》所收诗文年限相近，体例也相似，因此，文章还将探讨《古文苑》与《文选》的关系。另外，还以《古文苑》为底本，以《艺文类聚》、《初学记》作为参校本，将其中所共同收录的诗文进行比勘，依据具体的比勘结果来考察《古文苑》中作品的来源，分析《古文苑》同唐代类书的关系，并且参证其成书年代。关键词:《古文苑》编纂宗旨《艺文类聚》 编纂体例《初学记》作品文本成书年代更多还原

【Abstract】 "GuWenYuan" is a literary selection which collects 264 literary works from East Zhou Dynasty to Nan Dynasty. These poems and essays are all not selected by "Wen Xuan" and writers’ biography in history .so it is of great value to collating and compiling the literary works in Wei,Jin,Nan,Bei Dynasty .Scholars in Ming,Qing Dynasty always took the works in this selection when they edited a writer’s literary anthology in Wei,Jin,Nan,Bei Dynasty .At the same time, this literary selection had many doubtful points. For example, people didn’t know the actual edited time of this book. It was said that this literary anthology was found in a shrine by SunZhu who was a literati in North Song Dynasty. According to his viewpoint, this book was compiled by an anonymous scholar in Tang Dynasty . Up to now ,the edited time of "GuWenYuan" was still not defined.So I took this problem into account in this thesis firstly and had proved that this selection was not compiled in Tang Dynasty but in Song Dynasty.Secondly, this thesis discussed the compiling purpose and the stylistic rules and layout of this selection.Thirdly, ancient scholars always considered that the literary works in "GuWenYuan" had been deleted just like those in reference books suchas "YiWenLeiJu" and "ChuXueJi" ect. After comparing the text in "GuWenYuan" with "YiWenLeiJu" and "ChuXueJi", I concluded that the text in "GuWenYuan" was not an abbreviated version.更多还原