【作者】 苏静；

【导师】 高富平；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 民商法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 随着电子计算机普及和互联网的快速发展,目前全球范围内已经基本实现了网络全球化,普遍化,这使人们的日常生活、生产、消费等方方面面发生了深刻的变化,同时也带来了商业运行模式的重大变革,商业运行模式实现了从传统文字处理和信息传递领域向电子、网络领域的根本性转变,网络商业化已成为一种不可抵挡的趋势,开辟出与传统商务模式不同的商务模式,即电子商务。电子商务中最主要的组成部分(或是最核心的部分)就是在线交易,在线交易突破传统的交易模式,在世界范围内正以惊人的速度发展,可以说,在线交易是目前我们所普遍关注的重点。但是网络环境的虚拟化、跨地域性、不确定性也产生了不少消极问题,目前在线交易所面临着巨大的挑战就是在线拍卖欺诈。在线拍卖欺诈已经给在线交易蒙上了一层阴影,严重损害了在线交易当事人的合法利益,挫伤了他们从事在线交易的积极性,也限制了在线交易的发展前景。但是,针对这种日益严重的网上欺诈,现有的传统的法律却<WP=3>显得苍白无力,因此迫切需要改变现有的法律以及加强有关电子商务领域的立法,以适应日益变化的互联网环境。目前世界各国正在积极寻求规范在线交易欺诈的行之有效的法律法规。就我国的电子商务立法来看,由于我国的电子商务发展较其他发达国家较晚,这方面的立法较少,规范在线交易的立法还没有,更别说专门规范在线交易欺诈的专门性立法了,目前规范这类行为主要还是要靠民法和合同法等传统的民事法规。但是现行的法律对这种新型的欺诈类型缺乏有效监督和规范,而且现有的某些法律规则适用于网上欺诈对受害方殊为不利,使其很难得到应有的救济,如何规制和防止在线交易欺诈是当务之急。本文主要分三个部分:第一部分主要是比较分析了在线拍卖与传统拍卖区别,以及结合传统民事欺诈的构成要件,揭示了在线拍卖(在线交易)欺诈的内涵和本质。第二部分主要是分析在我国现有的法律框架下,传统的法律规定对这种类型的欺诈行为缺乏有力的规制,对受欺诈方来说,很难通过目前的法律获得应有的救济。第三部分注重分析了我们应当如何规制和防治在线拍卖欺诈。结合中国目前的实际,借鉴国外(主要是美国)一些成功的经验和,通过改变被欺诈方救济难的不利地位,赋予他们有效和合理的救济能力和救济措施;通过加强事前的防治,主要是通过规范和强化交易网站在此方面的作用,以及政府加强该方面的立法,以规范的法律对网上欺诈行为进行有力的控制和防范。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the development of the computer and internet ,all-over the world is becoming more and more contactable online ,which impact much on the traditional customs of people’s produce ,consume and other aspects ,which also insult in the great change of the business process, including the essential changing of the business mode from traditional word-dealing and information transportation to electronic information transferring ,the unchangeable trend of the online transaction which differentiates much from the traditional business .It announces the era of the electronic commerce. The essential part of the EC is online transaction ,which change the traditional business mode and develop fast throughout the world ,attracting the mostly attention of the world .But everything has two sights ,the virtualizility ,trans-region ,uncertainty of the cyber-environment leads to the possibility of the outcome of the shortcomings .Nowadays the greatest challenge of the online transaction is online auction fraud, which attainting the online transaction ,seriously damaging the online transaction parties’ legal interests , degrading the enthusiasm of the one addressing to buy/sell merchandise online ,resulting limit the prospect of the online transaction .Facing the challenge of the enormous and increasing online auction fraud ,the traditional legal system was seemed as less and less effective and efficient . The up-grading of the traditional legal regime is becoming more and more urgent , made it adapt to the ever-changing internet environment .Recently almost all of the countries in the world have been endeavoring to setup effective legislation to fight against the <WP=5>online auction fraud .As far as the Chinese e-business law is concerned , there are few legislations concerning EC and even less legislations regulating the online transaction because of the late and slowly development of Chinese EC . But the traditional legal regime has no provisions concerning the issues coming from the online transaction , such as online auction fraud and so on ,which is new to the legal system and the judges .The courts have to resolve the cases concerning the online transaction with traditional civil laws ,such as the Civil Code and the Contract Law and etc . But the present legal system has no effective instrument preventing this new kind of fraud ,and it can’t give adequate relief to the victims of the online auction fraud .If conformity to some of provisions or principles of the traditional and present legal regime , such as the principles about the jurisdiction and burden of proof ,even it would be impossible to bring a action against the criminals committing online fraud . It’s crucial to update the legal system to adapt to the need of fighting against the online fraud .There are three parts in this article .The first part includes the comparative analysis of online auction and traditional auction ,the conclusion of the essence of the online auction according to the analysis of the component of the traditional civil fraud .The second part is concerned about the defect of the legal regime nowadays ,wanting of effective regulation to the online auction fraud ,giving no effective and equitable relief to the victims of the online fraud .The third part analyses how to prohibit and regulate the online auction fraud .According to the Chinese economic and legal environment ,referring to the successful experience of the foreign nations (especially the USA ),changing the adverse status of the victims of online fraud difficult to get the effective judicial relief by the means of granting them the effective and reasonable ability and implementation of relief ,strengthening the pre-preventing of the online auction fraud through the strengthening of the legislation regulating the online transaction and enhancing the effect of the website in the EC ,strongly control and prohibit the online fraud ,especially the online auction fraud .更多还原