【作者】 綦保国；

【导师】 彭熙海；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 民商法， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 协商是合同当事人意思表示达成一致的基础,是契约自由原则在合同订立过程中的具体体现,然而,格式条款的最重要特征是其不可协商性。因此,格式条款的出现及其广泛运用,直接挑战了传统合同理论的根基——契约自由原则。以经典契约模式为参照系,不难发现格式条款合同关系的内在缺陷,即格式条款合同关系中主体地位的不平等性,契约自由的形式性和虚假性,以及条款内容的不公平性。因而,对格式条款的规制势在必行,其宗旨在于谋求强者与弱者双方的利益平衡,以实现社会的实质正义。纵观世界各国格式条款规制史,其总体发展趋势有二:一是从对格式条款的订立程序的规制延伸到对格式条款内容的规制;二是对格式条款规制范围不断扩大,内容不断具体。尽管格式条款规制的途径有:立法规制、司法规制、行政规制和社团规制,但我国的格式条款规制的制度体系还处在初建阶段,不足之处颇多,无法适应形势的需要。因而,对我国格式条款规制的制度体系进行完善犹如利箭在弦、张弓以待,急需我国法律工作者和理论家在实践和理论上大胆、果断地采取行动。更多还原

【Abstract】 Consultation is the basis on which the parties to a contract reach an assent and the concrete manifestation of the doctrine of contractual freedom in the course of signing a contract. However the most important characteristic of format terms is nonnegotiable. As a result, the appearance and widespread use of format terms directly provoke a challenge to the foundation of traditional contract theory—The doctrine of contractual freedom. Compared with classical contract mode, it is not difficult to find out the internal drawbacks in contractual relation of format terms——the parties’ unequal status in contractual relation of format terms; the formality and falsity of contractual freedom and the unfairness of the content of the terms. So it is inevitable to regulate format terms, whose aim is to seek balance between the weak’s interest and the strong’s interest so as to realize social material justice. From the world’s history of format terms’ regulation, two trends can be seen on the whole: the first is that the regulation of the concluding procedure of format terms has been expanded into the regulation of the content of formal terms; the second is that the scope of format terms’ regulation is being widened and its content is more and more concrete. There are four ways to regulate format terms: legislative regulation, judicial regulation, administrative regulation, and social group regulation. However, still in infancy, the system of our country’s format terms’ regulation has many drawbacks and can not meet the need of society. So it is urgent to perform regulating system of our country’s format terms, just as a arrow fitted to the bowstring cannot be discharged. And it also requires our country’s legal workers and theorists to take action audaciously and resolutely.更多还原