【作者】 赵峰；

【导师】 杨海坤；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 就世界范围来看，公务员在执行公务过程中，由于重大过错侵犯相对人权益的，其个人或多或少、或直接或间接均要承担一定的赔偿责任。 目前，我国有关公务员重大过错侵权责任的追究，尤其是追究赔偿责任的立法很不完善，执行严重不力。在理论上，我国学者对行政侵权中有关公务员的赔偿责任的认识存在一定程度的偏见和误解。本文在自己责任原则的基础上确立的公务员重大过错行政侵权赔偿责任可以促使公务员依法行政，更加全面地保护相对人利益，避免和减轻纳税人不必要的负担。 为了防止公务员赔偿责任被不适当地扩大，本文论述了公务员承担赔偿责任的构成要件。 总之，公务员应当对其存在重大过错的公务侵权行为承担个人赔偿责任，国家在必要时承担不真正连带责任。这一制度设计有利于实现国家、公务员和相对人三者之间利益的平衡。更多还原

【Abstract】 Civil servants have to compensate for a loss or pain and suffering more or less, directly or indirectly for breaching duty of care seriously in implementing administrative affairs. That has been generally recognized by various countries of the world. In China it has many defects in legislation and practice. In theory, scholars misapprehend several points about it in academic research. On the "Individual Responsibility Principle", we suggest civil servants should take the responsibilities of their torts. The practice can urge the civil servants act legally, protect people’s interests roundly and take off unnecessary burden of taxpayers. What’s more, the essential components of the responsibility are explained in order to avoid expanding the responsibility infinitely. In conclusion, it’s necessary to make the civil servants themselves burden the compensations and the state assume artificial related responsibility so as to realize the balance of the interests of state, civil servants and victims.更多还原