节点文献

银雀山汉简校读丛劄

【作者】 刘冬

【导师】 施谢捷;

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 , 中国古典文献学, 2004, 硕士

【摘要】 本文校讀銀雀山漢簡,採用與傳世古籍對校的方式,充分利用歷代學者的校讀成果,有所取舍,有所辯證。運用校勘學、歷史文獻學、文字學、訓詁學、攷據學的方法,希冀對簡文釋讀、注釋和傳世古籍的校勘有所發明,為古籍的整理定本做一點事情。 千古兵書糾結難明之處,歷代學者有些是暫付闕如,有些是眾說紛紜,我們利用比較接近原本而又無長期流傳產生的訛誤的銀簡,並結合各種善本,正定是非,釋文解惑。此文是校讀叢劄,非校記,所以範圍、形式上有些不拘舊格。本文將校勘和訓詁相結合,也就是把古文獻整理與古漢語研究相結合,因為兩者合之則雙美,離之則兩傷。對當代學者的有關幾部兵書的正文訓釋亦有所辯證,提出一孔之見,以示對兵書的探赜索隱有所與也。

【Abstract】 The text emendates han dynasty grave bamboo slips from yinque mountain by way of in comparison with ancient books handed down from ancient times,fully utilize past dynasties scholars’ collative production and sometimes accept or reject,sometimes discriminate.By means of collating decipline, historygl philology, philology, glossary; textual research, culture, hope to contrivance words and notation in the bamboo slips, collation to ancient books handed down fromAncient times, and offer any help to trime and edition’ fixing on for ancient books.In the instance that past some dynasties scholars lie over dout, others vary opinions to questions in centuries-old tactics books, we modify and explainm, imposing yinque moutain han dynasty bamboo slips that comparatively approach boms and aren’ t there errors for going round long-standingly, besides linking all kinds of reliable text. The paper is reading notes, not emending excursus, so don’t stick to scope and form. The paper integrate collatation and words explain, i.e.integrating ancient literature trimming and ancient Chinese research, because so both are good, the other way round both bad. Discriminate to scholars of the time’ explains for tactics books, for the sake of attaching myself to investigate the hidden mysteries of things.

  • 【分类号】K877
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】404
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络