【作者】 沈莺；

【导师】 郑伟；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 刑法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 国际恐怖主义犯罪作为一种新的犯罪类型,自 80 年代起逐渐为人们所关注。近些年来,以美国“9·11 事件”为标志的恐怖主义犯罪给整个人类社会带来了极大的威胁。与此同时,我国也正面临着国际恐怖主义犯罪的巨大威胁并深受困扰。鉴于国际恐怖主义犯罪极为严重的社会危害性,为了严厉打击和惩治该类犯罪,从法律上对普通民众予以最佳的保护,我国立法机关及时进行了法律的修正与完善。但这仅仅表现在对罪名设置的修正上,关键还缺乏有关打击措施的立法,因此目前我国立法还无法应对当前国际恐怖主义犯罪形势发展需要。进一步完善国际恐怖主义犯罪的立法,使之系统化和全面化成为本文研究的立足点。 文章从国际恐怖主义犯罪的概念界定入手,对该类犯罪的法律特征进行了深入分析,通过对国外国际恐怖主义犯罪惩治措施的立法与实践的借鉴,提出了惩治该类犯罪的惩治模式与具体措施。为了更好得将这些立法和惩治模式与我国现行刑法的规定相融合,最后笔者提出与我国国情相适应的惩治措施及立法建议。 本文全文共分五章:惩治的前提——国际恐怖主义犯罪的概念界定、惩治的依据——国际恐怖主义犯罪的法律特征分析、各国国际恐怖主义犯罪惩治措施的立法与评述、国际恐怖主义犯罪惩治措施的完善、我国关于国际恐怖主义犯罪的立法与完善。全文约三万三千字。 第一章:惩治的前提——国际恐怖主义犯罪的概念界定。本章论述了概念界定的价值,评述了当前国际恐怖主义犯罪概念的立法。在此基础上,确立了国际恐怖 2<WP=4>主义犯罪概念的基本要素包括:前提(与国际犯罪特质的吻合),基本要素(犯罪构成要件),本质特征(恐怖性),并据此提出了概念的可行性界定。第二章:惩治的依据——国际恐怖主义犯罪的法律特征分析。本章分别阐述了该类犯罪的三大特征:国际犯罪框架下的基本特质、极为严重的社会危害性和严密的组织犯罪,为下文提出惩治措施提供法律依据。第三章:各国国际恐怖主义犯罪惩治措施的立法与评述。各国对恐怖主义犯罪的立法主要有四种形式,本章重点研究了三个具有代表性的国家(日本、法国和俄罗斯)立法。各国对恐怖主义犯罪的惩治措施主要包括三大类:组建专门的反恐机构、扩大刑事管辖权和加大反恐执法和司法的力度。对这些立法和实践予以评述,这为下文阐述的完善建议提供了直接参考。第四章:国际恐怖主义犯罪惩治措施的完善。树立正确的惩治理念和原则是完善惩治措施的前提。本章重点论述了惩治的基本模式——国际合作机制,突出了在惩治国际恐怖主义犯罪中国际刑事司法协助的重要性。据此,完善的具体措施得以有效提出,即:建立国际反恐公约,进一步加强国家间的执法合作和确立综合法律机制。第五章:我国关于国际恐怖主义犯罪的立法与完善。本章回顾了我国的反恐历程,对《刑法修正案(三)》做出了评述,阐述了我国在惩治国际恐怖主义犯罪的立法与实践层面进一步加以完善的必要性。最后,笔者提出加强和完善我国反恐怖主义立法的完善建议,即:修改和完善刑法,制定全面系统的反恐怖主义犯罪条款;制定一部反恐怖主义犯罪的专门法规;实现反恐怖主义立法的全球化。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the new form of crime, international terrorism attracted people’sattention in the 1980s. In recent years, international terrorism has broughtextremely serious harm to average people, the symbol being the hideousevent named “9·11”. Meanwhile, China is confronted with the crime andinvolved in the series of events greatly. In view of the extremely seriousdanger of the crime, and for the purpose of severe attack on the crime aswell as the possible best protection of people, the related authorities havemade revision and certain perfection. However, the legislation is lacking inconcrete measures on attack of the crime. Therefore, considering thesituation nowadays, we need to perfect the related legislation and furtherstandardize it. This is the most basic starting point of the essay. The essay is divided into five parts: concept demarcation of internationalterrorism (prerequisite), the analysis of juristic features of the crime(foundation), legislation and comment on the adopted measures of othercountries, perfection of related measures of cracking down the crime, anddomestic legislation and perfection of international terrorism. ChapterⅠ: Prerequisite of attack-- concept demarcation of internationalterrorism. This chapter illustrates the value of concept demarcation andcomments on the legislation of the notion. On the basis of the discussionabove, the basic composition of the notion is proposed, that is,premise—consistence with the feature of international crime, composition ofcrime, essential feature—terror. Chapter Ⅱ: Foundation of attack-- the analysis of juristic features of the 4<WP=6>crime. This chapter focuses on the three characteristics of the crime: basicfeature on the frame of international crime, extremely serious harm, andstrictly organized structure. Chapter Ⅲ: Legislation and comment on the adopted measures of othercountries. There are mainly four forms of legislation for internationalterrorism crime. Three typical countries are chosen to do research on therelated legislation. It includes Japan, France, and Russia. Through theanalysis, we find that three main categories are included in the whole systemof anti-terrorism: setting up the specialized anti-terrorism organ, expandingthe jurisdiction, and strengthening the force of execution and justice. Chapter Ⅳ: Perfection of related measures of cracking down the crime.Definite perspective and principle is regarded as the precondition of themeasure. This chapter gives prominence to the establishment of the basicpattern of attack—global cooperation, and illustrates that it plays animportant role in the international judicial assistance. Thus, concretemeasures are proposed, that is, setting down the international anti-terrorismtreaty and reinforcing the force of cooperation of execution among nations. Chapter Ⅴ: Domestic legislation and perfection of international terrorism.In retrospect, this chapter comments on the latest revision of criminal law,and discusses the necessity of perfection on the stage of legislation andpractice. Finally, suggestion of perfecting domestic anti-terrorism law isproposed: revising and perfecting criminal law, setting down the whollysystematic article of anti-terrorism, and the globalization of legislation onanti-terrorism.更多还原