【作者】 孔令营；

【导师】 蒋集跃；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 法律， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 我国民诉法对当事人取证权利的程序保障至今鲜有规定,这不仅使我国民诉法的内容之间无法有机衔结,甚至出现冲突和矛盾,凸显了我国立法技术上的缺陷和理论研究的欠缺,而且关键还在于审判实践中它使当事人无法完成举证重任,从而可能使审判方式乃至整个民事诉讼体制和制度改革的良好初衷化为灰烬。要解决这一问题就必须加强对当事人取证权利程序保障的研究。这不仅有利于我国的民事诉讼理论的现代化,而且也必将对我国的民事审判方式改革的深入开展乃至整个民事诉讼体制和制度的改革起到积极的推动作用,必将有助于民事诉讼程序价值的实现。本文拟从剖析我国建国以来取证制度的立法及运行概况入手,在论证赋予当事人取证权利的程序保障是民事诉讼改革的必然要求的基础上,结合对国外民事诉讼当事人取证权利程序保障的一般考察,再对当事人取证权利程序保障的价值目标进行论证。最后,对我国当事人取证权利的程序保障的建构进行认真探讨。文章分为五部分。第一部分:引言。从证据在现代民事诉讼中的重要性入手,引申出目前研究赋予当事人取证权利的程序保障的必要性。第二部分:我国取证制度的立法概况及运作评析。对建国以来尤其是现在我国 1<WP=4>的证据制度的概况进行评析,剖析了当事人因缺乏取证权利的程序保障难以获取充分证据的状况及由此在司法实践中产生的诸多弊端。第三部分:对建立当事人取证权利程序保障是民事诉讼改革的必然要求加以阐述。本部分从转变庭审模式、当事人履行举证责任、重构审前程序、实现诉讼改革目标的要求入手,阐述赋予当事人取证权利的程序保障的重要性和必要性。第四部分:对国外当事人取证权利程序保障的一般考察。通过对两大法系主要国家当事人取证制度的一般考察,笔者认为:在取证举证上奉行当事人主义的两大法系主要国家的当事人在取证与举证上均得到了较充分的程序保障,我国民事诉讼模式在向当事人主义转换的过程中,应借鉴国外的相关规定,并结合我国的国情建立有中国特色的当事人取证权利的程序保障制度。这样不仅能消除我国法律间的矛盾和冲突,而且有助于我国民事审判方式乃至民事诉讼体制和制度的改革。第五部分:我国当事人取证权利程序保障的建构。本部分首先从有助于实现实体公正和程序公正,有助于提高诉讼效益,有助于民事诉讼改革和遏制司法腐败等方面入手,探讨了当事人取证权利的程序保障的诉讼价值。然后,对我国当事人取证权利程序保障的建构进行了初步探讨。更多还原

【Abstract】 The code of civil procedures in our country takes concerned the proceduralguarantees of the parties’ certificate right until now is fresh to have theprovision, which not only makes the contents of the code of civil proceduresunable to be linked up organically, even leads to the clash with the antinomyand presents the blemish on the lawmaking technique of our country and lackswith theories investigation, but also makes the party unable to complete theheavy responsibility of proof-offering in the judicial practice, so makesthe good original intention of the reform in trial methods and the whole civillawsuit system reduced to ashes. To solve this problem must strengthen theresearch of the procedural guarantees of the parties’ certificate rightconcerned. This not only benefits the theoretical modernization in civillawsuit in our country, but also will push forward the development of thereform in trial methods and the whole civil lawsuit system deeply and willlend itself to realize the procedural value of civil lawsuit. This textintends to start with the analysis of the legislation and the general practiceof the certificate system, and from the basis of arguing that the proceduralguarantees of the parties’ certificate right is the inevitable request of thecivil lawsuit reform, and combination to the general investigation of abroadcivil case concerned the procedural guarantees of the parties’ certificateright, proceeds with the argument about the value goals of the proceduralguarantees of the parties’ certificate right. Finally, this article takesthe earnest study of the construction of the procedural guarantees of the 1<WP=6>parties’ certificate right. The article is divided into five parts. The first part: Preface. Starting with the importance of proof in themodern civil case, then amplifies on the necessity of the research concernedthe procedural guarantees of the parties’ certificate right for the present. The second part: The general lawmaking situation and operation critiquesof the certificate system in our country. Comments on the general situationin proof since the foundation of our nation particularly at present, analyzesthe situation inaccessible to obtain the proof because of lack of theprocedural guarantees of the parties’ certificate right and theirregularities produced in judicial practice. The third part: The expatiation that establishing procedural guaranteesof the parties’ certificate right is the inevitable request of the reform incivil case. This part reviews from the change of trial mode, the fulfillmentof the parties’ proof-offering duty, the reconstruction of pretrial procedureand the realization of the litigation reform, expatiating the importance thatgives the right guarantees with the necessity. The fourth part: The general investigation of abroad proceduralguarantees of the parties’ certificate right. Through the generalinvestigation of procedural guarantees of the parties’ certificate right inthe main nations of The two law families, the writer holds: concerning withthe certificate and proof-offering duty taking up the partilism concernedthe parties in the main nations of The two law families, all get sufficientprocedural guarantee, and during the course of the conversation to thepartilism concerned our civil case mode, we should draw lessons from therelated system of the abroad, and establish the chinese characteristicprocedural guarantees system of the parties’ certificate right combined withour country’s situation, which not only dissolves the antinomy of theconflicts between our laws, but also is beneficial to the reform of the civilcase methods with institutional system. The fifth part: The construction of procedural guarantees of the parties’certificate right. This part first starts with the aspects in favor ofrealizing the entitative and procedural fairness, enhancing litigationbenefit, reforming civil case a更多还原