【作者】 刘义芳；

【导师】 张纯；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 经济法， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 反垄断法域外适用的理论与实践起源于美国，并且它在美国的发展也最为迅速。但即使是在美国，它的发展与推动也还远不能说是成功的。在美国国内，美国国会、司法部、法院等在此问题上的立场还不完全一致；在实践中也屡屡受到其他国家的反对和报复。美国反垄断法域外适用的主要原则是效果原则。但由于效果原则在具体适用时所遇到的困难，使美国不得不结合合理管辖原则来平衡美国与外国的利益冲突，这产生了一定的积极效果。欧盟和其他国家则基本仿效了美国的做法，只是在理论依据和一些具体措施上稍有不同而已。欧盟法院采用客观领域原则来作为效果原则的法理依据并且使用了与美国不同的表述，在内容上则与美国并无多大区别。值得注意的是，欧盟法院所提出的单一经济实体原则是对反垄断法域外适用理论的一个重大发展。 对于反垄断法域外适用中所出现的各项适用原则，我们应该摒弃效果原则与实际履行地原则，而按属地原则、单一实体原则、属人原则的总体排序来域外适用反垄断法。这样才能使反垄断法的域外适用既有充分的法理依据，又能最大可能地避免和消除冲突。 反垄断法域外适用中法律冲突问题的解决方式主要有单边、双边及多边途径三种方式。双边途径是目前所能找到的最好方式，其中美欧协定具有示范作用。多边途径的方式特别是国际统一反垄断法的建立是我们最终的目标。 中国应该在《反垄断法》中设置域外适用条款，当然在具体适用时因中国的情况不同所以也应有所区别。我国不需像其它国家那样制定“抵制”条款，而应该更广泛地采取双边合作途径来解决冲突问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 Extraterritorial application of the antimonopoly law originated from America, where its theories and practices have most swiftly developed. America has mainly used the effect principle in the extraterritorial application of the antimonopoly law. But America often use the principle of reasonable jurisdiction to balance the interest between America and other countries. European Union and other countries have basically followed the example of American practices except that there are slight differences in theoretical bases and some specific practices. The court of justice of European Union has adopted the objective territorial principle as the theory ground. Though it is conveyed in a different way, there is not much differences in essence between America and European Union.What attracts our attention is the prinple of single entity,which promots the theory of the extraterritorial application of the antimolopoly law greatly.The author upholds that we must maintain the extraterritorial effect of the antimonopoly law according to the general sequencing of the principle of territory, that of single entity and that of nationality, but abandons the principle of effect and the principle of place of specific performance .Conflict problems in extraterritorial application of the antimonopoly law are generally solved unilaterally, bilaterally or multilaterally. A unilateral way is currently the best one acceptable, with the America-Europe Pact as a demonstration. A multilateral way, especially the establishment of the International Uniform Antimonopoly Law, is our ultimate goal.China should have the article of extraterritorial effect set in its Antimonopoly Law. Needless to say, the Law should be applied in accordance with the situation in China. The author elaborates on how respective principles should be applied in China. He holds that China should solve conflict problemes through more extensive bilateral cooperation instead of making any "boycott" articles as other countries do.更多还原