【作者】 汪键；

【导师】 蔡杰；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 倾向性证据是英美法系一个重要的证据形式，但我国证据法学界却很少对这一特殊的证据进行详细的介绍。鉴于我国目前正在热烈讨论是否制定一部统一的证据法，因此，对国外尤其是对英美法系证据法进行比较研究显得尤为必要。而倾向性证据又是英美法系里比较独特的证据，对它的研究可以探微出英美法系证据规则与诉讼制度某种内在的联系。从而为我国未来制定证据放提供一个参考的平台。 在具体的行文中，文章分为四个部分，分别是概念比较、相似事实证据、品格证据和我国对倾向性证据规则借鉴空间。由于倾向性证据对我们来说还是一个新的概念，因此，文章偏重于对其的介绍。倾向性证据是由相似事实证据和品格证据两个证据组成的，对于相似事实证据，文章按其逻辑结构将影响其运用的三个最著名的案例进行了介绍；对于品格证据，文章则以归纳的方式从其运用主体和运用特点两方面进行了阐述。最后，通过对我国目前司法现状的分析，文章对我国是否应该借鉴以及如何借鉴倾向性证据规则提出了一些具体的意见。更多还原

【Abstract】 Although disposition evidence is an important evidence rule of Anglo-American law system, Chinese scholars seldom introduce and study it explicitly. Considering there is a hotly debate about whether China should adapt a general evidence rule in Chinese legal circle, it’s necessary to study foreign evidence rules, especially Anglo-American ones. Disposition evidence is one of them.As for construction of the paper, it is divided into four parts: comparison of concepts, similar facts evidence, character evidence and transplantation of disposition evidence in China. The paper attach more important to introduce disposition evidence since it is new for us. Disposition evidence consists of similar fact evidence and character evidence, and both of them are introduced. Similar fact evidence is illustrated by three cases, and character evidence is presented from two points of operation features and applied parties. At last, some options about whether China should adopt and how to adopt disposition evidence are rendered.更多还原