【作者】 高媛；

【导师】 李欣广；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 国际贸易， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 目前，关于国际竞争力的理论从总体看都是在企业或国家的层次上进行的研究。迈克尔波特是第一位从产业层次研究国际竞争力的学者。他认为，一国特定产业是否具有国际竞争力取决于六个方面的因素：即生产要素、需求状况、相关及辅助产业、企业的经营战略结构与竞争方式，以及机遇和政府行为。 服务贸易对提高国民经济整体效率和质量具有特殊作用，尤其金融、电信等命脉产业对技术及安全性要求较高，有一定的潜在优势，并对其他部门有技术外溢效应，代表了未来的产业方向，有较高的收益率——笔者定义其为“战略性服务业”。本文以波特的竞争力理论为指导，紧紧围绕影响产业竞争力的六要素，并以金融、电信业为例，对我国战略性服务业的竞争力现状给以详细剖析，并从政府和企业两层面阐述了培养国际竞争力的途径。在政府作用方面，波特的竞争优势理论中只强调政府要为本国产业提供公平的竞争环境，而笔者则从理论及现实的角度分析了政府保护对战略性产业的特殊作用。在企业层面，围绕企业创新这一核心因素，笔者结合我国战略性服务业的实际特点，从多角度为我国战略性服务业竞争力培养途径提出了新见解。 服务贸易涉及领域广，问题复杂，其理论体系尚待进一步完善和广西大学硕士学位论文我国服务贸易战略性产业国际竞争力研究统一。尤其是我国的服务贸易理论研究仍处于起步阶段，希望本文能时我国服务产业竞争力研究有所帮助。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, the theories on international competitiveness are generally on enterprise or nation aspect. Professor Michael E. Porter was the first who studied industrial competitiveness. According to him, whether a certain industry is competitive or not lies on the following six factors: Production factors, demand status, relevant or supporting industries, strategy and structure of the enterprises, opportunities and government behaviors.International trade on service involves many fields in and faces variable complicated problems, while its theoretical system waits to be perfected and unify further. Service trade plays a special role in improving the whole efficiency and quality of national economy. Especially some lifeblood industries, such as finance, telecommunications, etc., expect relatively much technology and security, are of certain potential advantages and the effect of technology overflow, direct other industries in the future, and are of relatively high earning ratio, which are defined as"strategic service" by the writer.Regarding Porter’s competitiveness theory as guide and taking finance and telecomm as examples, firstly the writer analyzes current competitive situations of our strategic services in detail, and then suggests means on cultivating international competitiveness. Certainly all the analyses are around the six key elements tightly influencing industry competitiveness. As for government’s functions, Porter’s theory only emphasized offering a fair competition environment for national industries, while the writer proves the special functions of government’s protection on the strategic services from both theoretical and realistic angles. As far as enterprises are concerned, a series of new opinions on building up competitiveness are put forward.Certainly, restricted by present ability, the writer couldn’t give completely mature views yet. Any comment would be appreciated.更多还原