【作者】 胡昊；

【导师】 林大津；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 英语语言文学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 近年来的文体学研究真可谓是突飞猛进、硕果累累，而且各种相关学科相互结合，使不同的文体学派应运而生。然而，令人遗憾的是，大多数派别都表现出明显的排他性。不少文体学家总认为自己的理论或者分析模式一枝独秀，唯我独尊。各派理论互为贬斥，互不相容。 针对这种种情况，本文提出一种多元与互补的文体分析模式，并指出我们在文体学界乃至整个学术研究领域都应该对各派理论采取宽容和开放的态度。文章首先回顾了四种有代表性的片面学派，以及此前对综合分析模式的种种研究。然后，通过辨证的 采用演绎法和反证法，对各种派别进行了正反两方的详尽剖析。最后，文章通过讨论演示了该模式的可操作性，以及它对文体学发展和文学教学能做出的贡献。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years, many detailed researches and various new developments in stylistics have been made with fruitful results, and at the same time different stylistic schools come into being mainly through transdisciplinary researches. However, most groups exclude the theories of others few of them focus a comprehensive study of the subject.To counter this tendency, the present research tries to put forward a pluralistic and complementary model (PC model) as well as a tolerant and open attitude in stylistic research or even in the whole academia. In order to do this, the current thesis has been organized into appropriate parts. After an underlying introduction, it presents a review of various one-sided stylistic approaches and the previous attempts of the comprehensive orientation. Then, by drawing upon dialectical methods from deduction to counterevidences, it manages to make, theoretically and practically, a detailed analysis of various kinds of stylistics, and with pros and cons compared. As a result the superiority of the pluralistic and complementary approach to others has instantly become clear. A separate discussion is also devoted to the assessing and exhibiting of its applicability. It is also hoped that this will be a contribution to a healthier development of stylistics.更多还原