【作者】 陈一新；

【导师】 吴仁平；

【作者基本信息】 江西师范大学 ， 外国哲学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 米歇尔·福柯是后现代主义的一个重要代表。他对西方的现代性作了深刻的批判。现代历史哲学是现代性有机的组成部分，所以，福柯对现代历史观也进行了全面、系统的批判。这种批判成为他历史哲学的独到部分。本文拟从分析福柯研究历史所使用的独特的考古学和谱系学方法入手，通过考察福柯对疯癫史、知识史、权力等历史过程的真实再现，全面揭示福柯对历史理性的颠覆、对位于现代历史意识和历史哲学核心处的康德的总体化人类中心主义的批判和对传统总体历史观进行瓦解的非历史主义的历史观，从而把历史重新编织为断裂的历史。总之，福柯倡导一种否定事物的本质起源，并强调间断性和个体化的非历史主义的历史观。更多还原

【Abstract】 As an importance representative of the post-modernism, Michel Foucault made an acute criticism on western modernity. Foucault also criticized wholly and systemically on modern history philosophy that is an organic part of modernity, and it constituted the unique character in his history philosophy. This paper reviews the process that Foucault reproduced lunatic history, knowledge history and power by analyzing archaeology and genealogy method used by Foucault. Further, the paper reveals Foucault’s subversion on historical nous, animadverts on Kant’s human-centrism that lies in the center of modern historical consciousness and philosophy, and expatiates Foucault’s Non-historicist view, which disintegrates traditional history view. In short, Foucault advocates a non-historicist history negating the essential origin of things and emphasizing the discontinuity and individualization.更多还原