【作者】 李朝龙；

【导师】 王明锁；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 民商法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 土地、建筑等不动产的自然属性已经决定了其不可能在自身范围内完全实现利用价值，而必须假借于他人的不动产，这是不动产互为一体的本质属性决定的。而地役权由于独特的权利结构模式和强大的功能效应，在土地资源日趋稀缺，土地利用关系日益复杂的情况下，再次为国人所瞩目。因此，在我国即将出台的《物权法》中应有地役权的一席之地，这也是学术界的主流观点。问题主要在于如何建构科学严谨的地役权制度，在其建构的过程中，外国法的移植和借鉴是必不可少的。对于这一点，我国做得并不成功。其根本原因在于，在移植和借鉴时对我国的现实严重缺乏关注：或者完全不顾我国国情，把我国的地役权制度变为外国法的翻版，或者在对我国国情没有充分理解的基础上，对外国法稍加改造，就成为我国的地役权制度。因此，要使建构的地役权制度为国人所接受和认可，进而有效运作，就必须把它放到土地公有制这个大背景下。本文在借鉴他人研究成果的基础上，对土地公有制条件下的地役权制度进行了探讨。本文由引言、正文和结语组成。 在引言中，对我国地役权制度进行了简单的论述，对我国学界的相关研究作了简单介绍，并以此导出本文的写作意旨。 正文分为四个部分： 第一部分：地役权的法理分析。在这部分，笔者对地役权的概念、性质、特征和功能进行了论述，同时对其他一些国家的相关立法和学术研究进行了简单介绍。 第二部分：地役权与相关权利。首先对地役权与所有权的关系进行了梳理，认为地役权是在所有权的基础上产生的，与所有权平等的一种独立权利。其次分析了地役权与相邻权的关系，认为二者是各自独立而又相互补充的关系。最后论述了地役权与人役权的关系，指出二者应实现互动发展。 第三部分：我国土地公有制对地役权制度的影响。在这一部分，分析了土地公有制对地役权的主体、可转让性和效力的影响，指出土地公有制条件下的地役权与土地私有制条件下的地役权制度有着巨大的差异。同时，论证了关注我国现实的重要性。 第四部分:关于我国地役权制度的立法思考。首先对地役权的立法价值进行分析，认为其立法价值在于土地利用的客观需要和自身独特的制度优势。其次论述了地役权制度的立法中应坚持的立法原则。最后对地役权制度立法体系的选择作了说明。 在本文的结语部分对全文进行了总结，并重申了关注我国现实的重要性。更多还原

【Abstract】 The natural property of such real estate as land and building etc decides it impossible to completely realize its use value in the sphere of self, but to be realized through that of others as assistant, this is decided by the essential property of mutual one body of real estate. Easement because of its unique right structural pattern and powerful function effect, once again arouses compatriot’s attention. For the land resource is becoming rare day by day and land use relations is becoming increasingly complexed, therefore, the soon releasing Law of Property Right of our country should have a proper position of easement, which is also the viewpoint of main stream in academic circle. The problem lies mainly in how to establish scientific strict easement system, during which process the transplant and borrowing of foreign law is necessary. Our country hasn’t done well in this. Its prime causes lie in seriously lacking of consideration of the reality of our own country, or completely disregarding the national condition of our country. Thus our national easement has become a reprint of foreign law or the sightly reviewed foreign law becomes our country’s easement system without fully understanding of our national reality. Therefore the establishment of easement system must be set in major background of public ownership of land to make it acceptable and effective. In this paper, the author make an exploitation of easement under the condition of public ownership of land on the foundation of other’s research accomplishment. The paper consists of introduction, text and conclusion.In the introduction, the author makes a brief exposition of our country’s easement system with outlining the related research and thus derive the writing intention of this paper.The text falls into four parts:The first part: the analysis of legal principle of easement. In this part, the author discussed the nature, feature and function of easement .In the meanwhile carried outsimple introduction for accademic research and the related legislation of some othercountries.The second part: Easement and its related right. First, the author combed the relationship between ownership and easement, thinking that.easement is produced on foundation of ownership, a kind of independent right equal to ownership, and then analysed the relationship between easement and adjacent right, thinking it to be both in the independent and mutual compensating. Finally, the author discussed the relations between easement and personal servitude, pointing out both should achieve interactive development.The third part: The influence of public ownership of land to easement. In this part, the author analysed how the public ownership of land influence the main body ,transferability and effectiveness of easement. Then analysed the huge distinction between easement under the condition of public ownership of land and of private ownership of land. At the time, the article expound and proved the importance of solicitude of the reality of our country.The fourth part: About the legislation thoughts of easement of our state. Firstly, the author analysed the legislation value of easement, thinking its legislation value lies in the objective need of land use and its unique system advantages. Secondly, the author thought we should keep to the legislation principles in the legislation of easement system. Finally, the author made an explanation about the option of legislation system of easement.Then the author summarized for the whole text and reiterated the important of solicitude to the reality of our country in concluding remarks.更多还原