【作者】 刘大为；

【导师】 熊国强；

【作者基本信息】 西安理工大学 ， 企业管理， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 科技进步是一个国家和民族进步的动力源泉，各级重点实验室在推动科技进步中发挥着重要的作用。随着各级重点实验室建设的深入，客观上需要对其绩效进行综合评价，目前我国在实验室绩效评价方面仍处于起步阶段，尚未形成系统的绩效评价体系，发展实验室绩效评价理论和完善评价方法体系对重点实验室的和建设和管理都具有现实意义。本文从陕西高校省级重点实验室绩效评价的问题出发，在重点实验室绩效评价理论和方法方面进行探索，旨在发展重点实验室绩效评价理论和完善绩效评价方法体系。 论文首先介绍陕西高校省级重点实验室的建设和管理现状，对重点实验室建设中存在的问题进行初步分析，根据对重点实验室绩效主要影响因素的分析建立了陕西高校省级重点实验室绩效评价指标体系；然后从横向和纵向两个角度对陕西高校省级重点实验室绩效进行评价；接着应用DEA投影理论和聚类分析对重点实验室绩效进行结构性评价；最后通过分析横、纵向评价结果以及结构性评价结果，找出陕西高校省级重点实验室的绩效问题和成因，并提出相应的改进建议。 文中主要应用数据包络分析(DEA)方法对陕西高校省级重点实验室进行相对有效性评价，在结构性评价中用到聚类分析方法，把层次分析法、主成分分析法用于确定指标权重和指标体系降维研究。本文给出的绩效评价方法体系在其他各级重点实验室评价中可借鉴应用，是重点实验室绩效评价理论方法体系的进一步完善和发展。更多还原

【Abstract】 Science and technology advancement is a dynamical resource of national progress. Key laboratories at all levels play an important role in promoting the science and technology advancement. With the further development of the key laboratories, evaluating their comprehensive performance objectively is required. At present, performance evaluation for laboratories in our country is just in initial stage, and the evaluation system has not come into being. Thereby, developing theories and improving methods of the evaluation have practical significance for laboratories’ construction and management. Based on the performance evaluation of the key laboratories of Shaanxi higher learning institutes, this paper probes into the evaluation theories and methods of key laboratories’ performance in order to developthe theories and improve methods of the evaluation.In this paper, the present running and managing situations of key provincial laboratories of Shaanxi higher learning institutes are introduced firstly, the problems in laboratories’ construction are analyzed, and the evaluating indicator system is established according to the main influencing factors. Secondly, the key provincial laboratories’ performance is evaluated from horizontal and vertical aspects. Thirdly, structural evaluation is made by using DEA (data envelopment analysis) projection theory and cluster analysis method. Finally, by analyzing thehorizontal, vertical and structural evaluating results, the problems in the laboratories’ performance and the causes are found out, and the corresponding improving advice is put forward.The main method for comparative efficiency evaluation of the key laboratories is DEA method. CA (cluster analysis) method is used in structural evaluation, AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and PCA (principal components analysis) methods are applied to determine the index weight and to reduce the dimension of index system. The performance evaluation system given by this paper can also be referenced in other key laboratories’ evaluation, it can also perfect and develop the theory system of key laboratories’ performance evaluation further.更多还原