【作者】 赵富强；

【导师】 杨海坤；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 行政法基本原则作为行政法的基本问题之一，历来为中外学者所关注，但由于行政法在各国产生和发展的政治、经济、文化背景各不相同及以学者们概括、归纳的方法和角度的差异，对行政法基本原则这一行政法的基本问题的表述也众说纷坛。本文通过对我国行政法基本原则现状的分析，指出当前占主导地位的“两原则说”之缺陷，从保障公民诉权的角度提出在行政法上确立“行政可诉性”原则的重要性和必要性。行政可诉性原则是行政合法性原则与合理性原则的应有之义，在当前建设“行政法治”的进程中有其存在的法理基础、实证法基础以及社会基础，对于促进我国行政诉讼制度的发展、进而建立司法审查制度具有重要意义。行政可诉性原则的具体内容包括三个子原则，即行政行为可诉假定原则、行政实体、程序双重可诉原则以及司法最终救济原则。考虑到我国目前行政诉讼的现状和不足，确保司法独立和建立行政判例制度是行政可诉性原则在中国制度设置的最重要的内容。随着中国加入WTO，被誉为“国际贸易行政法典”的WTO规则对于中国行政法、尤其是对行政诉讼制度的挑战将更为明显和复杂。以保障公民诉权为基本理念的行政可诉性原则的提出和建立，无疑会进一步拓宽我国行政诉讼的受案范围，适应WTO规则在裁判机构、司法复审和程序方面的要求，同时，行政可诉性原则的进一步发展，对于政府角色的转变和法治政府的建立也具有积极意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 The modern administrative law has endured only 20-year-long development in China, surprisingly, it gains some remarkable achievements on certain basic theory. Among these progresses, the enactment of Administrative Litigation Law in 1989 is a milestone in building a rule of law society, which indicates the establishment of embryonic form of judicial review system in China.However, due to the differences of social culture as well as the lack of legal tradition, the new-born administrative litigation system faces various challenges in its evolution, which include the narrow scope of litigation, the strict restriction of plaintiff and the lack of independence of administrative tribunal etc. This, from a theoretic analysis, is partly due to the premature of the research of the basic principles of administrative law. As a practical factor, the unreasonable establishment of certain legal system, such as court system, is also reliable for the outcome of these problems.With China’s formal entry into WTO in 2001, WTO rules brings big chance as well as challenge to China’s current statutes, especially administrative law, which makes those problems much clearer and more complicated.Based on the guarantee of the litigation right of citizen, this article intends to prove the importance and essentiality of litigable principle in administrative law through the analysis of the respected theory status quo. Thus set up the judicial system according to WTO requirements which based on China legal tradition with its own characteristic.This article can be divided into five parts. Through the illustration of current theory on the principle of administrative law, the first part analyzes the defects of dominated two-principle theory. The second part fully demonstrates the properaess of establishment of litigable principle from its jurisprudence basis, practical legal foundation and social groundwork. The third part gives a detailed elaboration of this principle, which consists of presumption of reviewability, reviewable of substantiality as well as procedure and finialjudicial remedy. Aimed at the administrative litigation status quo as well as its defects, the last but two part provides some institutional constructions of the litigable principle in China, among which the insurance of judicial impendence and building administrative case law are of most importance. The last part has a brief forecast of current administrative law, especially administrative litigation law given the possible challenge brought by the litigable principle and WTO membership.更多还原