节点文献

论行政诉讼中的司法变更权

Research on the Judicial Power to Modify the Administrative Acts in Administrative Litigation

【作者】 刘烁玲

【导师】 胡肖华;

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 , 诉讼法学, 2002, 硕士

【摘要】 “依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家”已经成为党和国家的奋斗目标。从一定意义上讲,法治国家的建成与否,关键在于是否真正实现了依法行政。在行政权无限扩张和膨胀的今天,加强对行政权的监督与制约也就显得刻不容缓。实践证明,司法审查(行政诉讼)制度的建立是对行政权进行监督和制约的最有效的手段,而通过司法变更具体行政行为则是司法权介入行政权的最突出表现。但是,作为一种对行政权最强有力的监控方式,司法变更权的行使必须十分小心,司法变更权行使得当,就能够起到遏错于先的功效;行使不当就有可能越俎代疱,干预行政机关职权范围内的事务。因此,研究司法变更权与行政权尤其是行政自由裁量权之间的关系,正确界定司法变更权介入行政权的广度和深度,对于我国行政诉讼制度的成熟与发展,对于行政法理论的丰富和完善,都有着非常重要的意义。从国内外已有的研究成果来看,目前尚缺乏对这一问题的全面、深入、系统的研究,对有的问题如司法变更权的性质、司法变更权的适用范围等尚存在较大争议。笔者在前人研究和探讨的基础上,通过分析司法变更权的涵义,通过分析国内外司法变更权的发展轨迹,指出了设立司法变更权的必要性与适当性,并对拓宽我国司法变更权的适用范围提出了自己的一些看法和主张,以期对我国的行政法治建设有所裨益。

【Abstract】 " To administer a country according to law and to construct a socialist legal state " has been a target of our country and party. In a sense, that whether we can construct a legal state mainly depends on whether we can really administrate according to law. It’s very urgent and necessary to supervise and control the administrative power (AP) when it’s widening and expanding so rapidly today. It has been proved that the establishment of judicial review (administrative litigation) system is the most effective method to supervise and control AP, and also, it’s the strongest way for judicial power (JP) to interfere the territory of AP when concrete administrative is modified through JP. However, JP to modify the administrative acts (JPMAA) must be carefully exercised, as it is so strong. If it is exercised properly, it will correct the mistakes before it appears; if not, JP will take the place of AP and interfere the affairs that belongs to the latter only . Therefore, it’s of great importance for the development of our country’s administrative litigation system and the perfection of the administrative law theory to study the relations between JPMAA and AP especially the administrative discretionary power. Looking round the research in this field both in and abroad, we can find that there is still short of study with profound and systematic consideration, and there is still lots of dispute on the specialty and the scope of application of the JPMAA. The author, on the basis of the predecessor and colleague’s research, makes clear of the implication of JPMAA, analyses the derivation process of JPMAA in and aboard. Furthermore, the author analyses the necessity and property to authorize<WP=17>JPMAA, and puts forward a series of opinions and measures on how to perfect the scope of application of JPMAA in our country, so as to give some reference for the legal construction of our country’s administration.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 湘潭大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2003年 02期
  • 【分类号】D915.4
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】351
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络