节点文献
定量脑电图对纳洛酮治疗颅脑损伤疗效的探讨
Quantitative Electroencephalogram Study on Effect Ofnaloxone on Acute Moderate and Severe Head Injuries
【作者】 但炜;
【导师】 唐文渊;
【作者基本信息】 重庆医科大学 , 神经外科, 2002, 硕士
【摘要】 目的:通过定量脑电图监测,探讨不同剂量的纳洛酮对急性脑伤患者不同伤情的疗效。方法:选择受伤后12小时内入院的急性脑损伤患者82例,按伤情轻重分为GCS3~5分、GCS6~8分、GCS9~12分三组。每组再分为纳洛酮治疗组和对照组。纳洛酮治疗组又分为小剂量组 (首剂负荷量1.2mg +4.8mg/d24小时内静脉持续泵入或4.8mg/d直接静脉持续泵入)及大剂量组(首剂负荷量2mg+0.3mg/kg/d24小时内静脉持续泵入)。用定量脑电图监测,观察用药前、用药后10分、30分、1h、2h、24h、48h、72hδ频段相对功率值及总功率值变化。结果:GCS9~12分组:小剂量(直接泵入组用药2h后)和大剂量纳洛酮治疗组用药10钟后,与对照组比较,其qEEG的δ频段相对功率值降低、总功率值增高,P<0.05。但治疗组内无显著性差异,P>0.05。<WP=5>GCS6~8分组:大小剂量纳洛酮治疗组用药后,上述两项脑电图指标与对照组相比均有改善,P<0.05,但大剂量组脑电图指标比小剂量组改善更明显,P<0.05。GCS3~5分组:上述两指标在纳洛酮治疗组与对照组间无显著性差异,P>0.05。结论:定量脑电图监测结果显示:本文选用的小剂量与大剂量纳洛酮对GCS9~12分中型脑伤有显著的治疗作用,但两种剂量的疗效无差异;对GCS6~8分重型脑伤,上述两种剂量虽都有明显疗效,但大剂量组疗效更显著;对GCS3~5分特重型脑伤,大剂量治疗甚至增加了首剂静脉推注量也未见明显的疗效。
【Abstract】 Objective: To reveal, by monitoring of qEEG, the effects of different dose naloxone on acute moderate and severe head injuries.Methods:82 patients with acute moderate and severe head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12, within 12 hours after injury) were selected for this study. According to the severity of injury, all patients were classified into three groups: GCS3~5、 GCS6~8 and GCS9~12. Patients of each group were then randomly assigned to treatment with naloxone or control. In naloxone groups, low doses of naloxone (1.2mg for one minute intravenously, followed by a 24-hour infusion of 4.8mg or constant infusion of 4.8mg/d) and high doses of naloxone (2mg/2min, followed by a 24-hour infusion of 0.3/kg) were administered respectively to the patients with acute<WP=7>brain injury with different severity for three days. Relative power of δ frequency and absolute power of 1-25 frequency were monitored with qEEG before and 0、10、30 minutes、1、2、24、48、72 hours after administration.Results: In GCS 9 to 12 group, relative power ofδfrequency and absolute power of 1-25 frequency were significantly different (P<0.05) in qEEG between naloxone groups and control group, while there was no significantly different of all parameters between low-dose and high-dose naloxone groups(P>0.05).In GCS 6 to 8 group, the two parameters were improved significantly in naloxone groups and were significantly different between low-dose and high-dose naloxone groups. In GCS 3 to 5 group, all parameters were not significantly different between naloxone group and control group.Conclusions: These results suggest that treatment with naloxone in patients with GCS of 6 to 12 is beneficial in terms of improved qEEG and there is not significant difference in low-dose and high-dose naloxone in GCS 9 to 12 group, but in GCS 6 to 8 group high-dose naloxone is better than low-dose naloxone. However, in GCS 3 to 5 group, high-dose naloxone may not be so effective.
- 【网络出版投稿人】 重庆医科大学 【网络出版年期】2003年 01期
- 【分类号】R651.15
- 【下载频次】80