【作者】 刘上江；

【导师】 刘绍瑾；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 文艺学， 2002， 硕士

【摘要】 在中国古代诗史中，阮籍的《咏怀诗》历来被誉为“旷代绝作”，同时也是绝对的难解之作，或谓它“百代之下，难以情测”，或称其“厥旨渊放，归趣难求”。对这样一部产生于“乱世”、且意旨模糊、含义深远的优秀组诗的解读，就构成了中国文学批评史上文学阐释的一大景观。 本文正是抓住了这一文学接受、阐释过程中的“无达诂”现象，以西方阐释学、接受理论的方法和视野，对阮籍《咏怀诗》阐释史进行了系统、细致的研究，发现并认为，传统的阐释方法偏重于社会历史的维度，热衷于对作者讽喻之旨、所言之志作考证、索隐式的解说；而以西方接受理论、阐释学来分析的现代论者又只是一般性论述“无达诂”和“读者”参与创造的合法性。但上述两者都无法解释这样一种接受现象：并不是所有古典文学作品都能享有《咏怀诗》那样如此丰富的多重解释、如此令人神往的阅读体验。读者参与创造的空间与作品所能提供的空白是紧紧联系的。有鉴于此，本文在注意读者维度、即《咏怀诗》的阐释者们的历史背景、文化语境、审美趣味的同时，更强调回归作品本身，具体分析《咏怀诗》隐喻、用典、否定、虚化等语言策略和意象经营，从文本内部结构揭示出它为读者驰骋想象、参与创造所提供的广大艺术空白。而这，对克服西方接受理论过分强调读者的任意性解读的弊端，可能有些微启示。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the history of Chinese ancient poetry ,Yuan Ji’s poetry anthology"YongHuaiShi" has been praised the most famous wo s in history". Hispoems are really difficult to interpret as critics said: "It is so difficult to perceive his poems" and "the purport of his poems is too deep to define. There fore the interpretations of his beautiful lyric, which is with obscure purport and deep connotation and created in a time of chaos, have become an important research in the history of Chinese literature criticism.This thesis pays much attention to the case of " Wu Da Gu" and tries to systematic analyze the interpretative history of Yuan Ji’s poems, basing on : interpretive theory and readers’ reception theory. It is found out that traditional interpretations always stress history angle. Critics usually analyzed the poems’ purport through their textual and indexical research.. However, some other discussions on "Wu Da Gu" and the "reasonability" of readers’ creative interpretation are too general. These modern critics’ discussions base on readers’ reception theory and interpretive theory of the west. Both of them can not explain such a phenomenon of reception: not all classical works have such great variation in their interpretation as "YongHuaiShi" do and such splendid reading experience could be hardly attained in other classical creation. The extent of readers’ possible creation.Hinges on how much blank the poems leave there. Drawing lessons from former studies, this thesis not only pay attention to the readers’ history background, cultural context, aesthetic interest, but also stress on text inself and make a concrete analysis of its linguistic techniqued and the employ of images such as metaphor, allusion, negation , nihility etc. telling how immense artistic blank is left for readers’ creation .This might give a little of enlightment to eliminat the reception theory’s one-sideness of stressing too much on the arbitrariness of readers’ interpretation.更多还原