论行政自由载量权

【作者】 陈迎；

【导师】 杨海坤；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 行政法， 2001， 硕士

【摘要】 行政自由裁量权的研究是行政法学研究的核心课题之一，也是实践性很强的课题。由于种种原因，我们目前对该课题的研究明显落后于行政法学研究的总体水平。理论研究的滞后已经直接影响到对行政自由裁量权的控制实践。本文在分析英、美、德、日等国家在相关课题上的理论研究成果以及对行政自由裁量权法律控制的实践经验的基础上，针对行政自由裁量权的本体、存在、运作以及法律控制等诸方面进行研究。认为：行政自由裁量权是一种受主客观标准限制的选择权。正确把握限制的标准是正确理解行政自由裁量权的实质权限范围的关键。法律控制下的行政自由裁量权既是法治建设的结果又是法治原则的有益补充。对行政自由裁量权法律控制的目的是二元的，它决定了控制的方式不是仅限于司法或准司法方式，而应该是立体的、综合的方式。包括法律控制和法律外控制、行政自律和外部监督。由于各国的国情不同控制的方式与标准有所区别，我们应该在实践的基础上探索适合我国国情的控制方式与控制标准。文章最后对我国对该课题的理论研究滞后的原因进行理性分析，对发展前景进行了展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 Research on administrative discretion is one of the core and very practical subject of administrative Law. Because of all sorts of reasons, generally speaking, in our country, the research in this field lags behind researches on administrative Law, which already directly influences the legal control of administrative Discretion.Through analyzing the related subjects in U.K., U.S.A., Germany and Japan etc., this article carries out researches focused on respects such as noumenon, existence, operation and legal control of administrative discretion. In the end, the general conclusions are drawn as:Administrative discretion is the powerof subjective choice under the standard control both objectively and subjectively. The keys to understand the controlling scope of administrative discretion are to understand correctly the standards of limitation, and to distinguish the formal scope from the substantial scope of administrative discretion.Administrative discretion is the right under the control of rule of law, and is the helpful implementation to the rule ofIIADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETIONABSTRACTlaw. It is required by the nomocracy construction in the law fields to add administrative discretion into law system.To carry out legal control on administrative discretion has its double goals. To define correctly the administrative discretion in the existing district of sub-action of administrative behavior, is the key to define the scope of judicial review. The legal control on administrative discretion is a kind of tridimensional and comprehensive control, including administrative self-control and control from outside. The practical controlling methods are different in different nations?environment. In the end of the article ,the author analyzes the reasons why the theoretical research and legal control in China lags behind those of other nations.ChenYing (administrative law)Directed by桯aikun yang更多还原