【摘要】 高校学报是一个特殊的学术期刊群体，在当今的发展中普遍存在缺少优质稿源、办刊理念滞后的困境。42所“双一流”高校学报自然科学版的学术影响力在2015—2024年均获得了大幅提升，其刊文规律值得研究。本文选择其中的20种基础学科学报作为研究对象，围绕4个关键办刊指标进行数据分析，得出了以下规律：年载文量要和期刊学术水平相匹配，要结合自身持续优化年载文量；要尊重参考文献的正常引用，拒绝非正常引用，尊重平均引文数量的客观发展规律；要破除“唯基金论”,用包容性吸引优质稿件；要客观对待和科学使用复合影响因子指标，注意自身历史数据的对比和同类期刊的对比。高校学报要尊重这些规律，注意从栏目、学科、出版周期、国际传播等多项因素综合考量，找出适合自身发展的期刊道路。更多还原

【Abstract】 University journal is a special type of adademic journal with general dilemma of lacking high-quality manuscript sources and up-to-date pulishing concepts in today′s development. The academic influence of the natural science edition of 42 double first-class universities journals increased significantly between 2015—2024, and their publication pattern could cast some extra light on the development of university journal. Twenty basic descipline journals of them were selected as the target of this study. Data of four key publication indicators of these university journal were collected and analyzed. From the findings of this study, the following conclusions were drawn. For each journal, it was compulsory to optimize the number of articles with its status. The number of articles published should match its academic level. The normal citation of reference should be treated with respect, abnormal citeations should be rejected. The objective development law of average count of citation should be followed. All high quality articles could be accepted and published. The concept of funded article only should be abandoned. The composite impact factor indicators should be treated objectively and used scientifically. It should be compared with historical data or data of similar journal. University journal should follow these rules and take into account other factors, such as columns, disciplines, publication cycles, and international communication to find a suitable path for its own development.更多还原