【摘要】 为了在道德思维中给“他者”以更重要的地位，为了强调“道德对象”与“道德主体”之间的不可忽视的差异，黄勇提出用“道德铜律”来超越“道德金律”，并借助中外哲学资源对此进行了详细论证。但是，无论是黄勇的“铜律”(或其他作者所谓“铂律”或“白金法则”)本身的内容，还是他对“铜律”进行的论证，都存在一些不容忽视的问题。尤其重要的是，黄勇想用“铜律”来表达的一些想法，完全可以通过对“金律”本身的说明和解释来表达；而黄勇在用“铜律”取代“金律”的同时，无谓地损失了“金律”的“能近取譬”的重要优点。更多还原

【Abstract】 To assign the “Other” a more prominent status in moral thinking and emphasize the irreducible differences between the “moral patient” and the “moral agent,” Huang Yong proposes the “Moral Copper Rule” as a means to surpass the traditional “Moral Golden Rule,” substantiating his claim through a detailed argument rooted in traditional Chinese philosophical resources. This paper argues, however, that significant issues persist within both the conceptual content of Huang’s “Copper Rule”(as well as related concepts like the “Platinum Rule”) and his argumentative strategy. Crucially, the core insights Huang seeks to convey via the “Copper Rule” can be fully articulated through a proper interpretation and elucidation of the “Golden Rule” itself. Moreover, by substituting the “Golden Rule” with the “Copper Rule,” Huang unnecessarily sacrifices a hallmark virtue of the former—the practical principle of “finding a metaphor in what is near”(neng jin qu pi).更多还原