节点文献
基于制度文本的粤港澳档案管理模式比较
Comparison of Archives Management Models in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao Based on Institutional Texts
【摘要】 在大湾区建设的国家战略背景下梳理粤港澳三地档案管理模式的差异,是推动区域内档案工作协同的基础性问题。本文以115份制度文本为对象,从制度、组织和业务三个维度分析了三地档案管理模式的主要特征。在制度建设上,内地档案工作建设包含多个效力层次,涵盖宏观和微观事项的制度体系,港澳地区的制度建设明显更为简略,偏重微观层面的业务规范。在组织模式上,内地强调由专门档案机构统筹管理社会整体档案资源,港澳的文件形成部门具有更大自主权。在业务模式上,内地强调“广泛性收集”,港澳则强调“针对性收集”,重视成本效益和历史价值。因此,要推进粤港澳档案工作协同,有必要突破碎片化部门对接的思维,建设网络状的协作机制。
【Abstract】 Under the national strategic context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area development, analyzing the differences in archival management models among the three administrative regions constitutes a fundamental issue for promoting archival collaboration within the GBA. This study examines 115 institutional texts, analyzing the main characteristics of archival management models across three dimensions: institutional, organizational, and operational. In terms of institutional construction, the mainland maintains a multi-tiered archival management regulation system spanning both macro and micro-level affairs, while the archival regulations in Hong Kong and Macao feature a simpler legal hierarchy, focusing predominantly on micro-level operational guidelines. Regarding organizational models, the mainland emphasizes centralized management of archival resources through archival departments, while Hong Kong and Macao grant greater autonomy to document-generating departments. Operationally, the mainland adopts a "comprehensive collection" approach, whereas the two Special Administrative Regions prioritize "targeted collection" with emphasis on cost-effectiveness and historical value. To enhance archival collaboration in the GBA, it is imperative to transcend fragmented departmental coordination and establish networked collaboration mechanisms.
【Key words】 Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area; Archival management; Comparative analysis of management models;
- 【文献出处】 浙江档案 ,Zhejiang Archives , 编辑部邮箱 ,2026年01期
- 【分类号】G271
- 【下载频次】180