【摘要】 刑法解释的方法论本体，应当是兼具法学方法与法律方法的统合论，而不宜局限于根据法学方法与法律方法的相对区分论所框定出来的法律方法。当下刑法解释的方法论范式之争，主要集中于功能主义刑法解释方法论的深刻反省，在理性审视新功能主义、积极的和消极的功能主义的基础上，聚焦于如何进一步“限制后果主义的适用方法”议题，依次反思法律后果取向主义所可能“造成的社会损害”、所应有的法律“规制信息”以及所能限制到最小限度的“实际负面影响”,以最大限度实现刑法解释结论整全有效性。整全性功能主义刑法解释论作为当下时代刑法解释的方法论范式，其创新内涵、反思发展和时代使命值得理性审视。更多还原

【Abstract】 The ontological core of criminal law interpretation methodology is an integrated theory that seamlessly fuses juristic method with legal method, rather than a compartmentalized account limited by the conventional distinction between the two.The most profound and architectonic debate within criminal-law methodology concerns its paradigmatic orientation. The contemporary focal point on the paradigmatic orientation of criminal-law methodology is a critical re-examination of functionalist interpretation. Building upon a balanced appraisal of neo-functionalism, as well as its assertive and its cautious variants, the inquiry zeroes in on“restricting consequentialist reasoning.”This entails a sequential interrogation of(i) potential social harm stemming from outcome-oriented adjudication,(ii) the regulatory information that legal doctrine must supply, and(iii) strategies for minimizing the“actual negative effects”of such reasoning. The objective is to maximize the integrative validity of interpretive outcomes.As the emergent methodological paradigm, integral functionalism’s innovation, continued refinement and normative vocation merit sober scholarly scrutiny.更多还原