【摘要】 《经典释文》中涉及引用的条目有两类：一是经书互引时，原文、引文经注的音义条目，二是《释文》引用他经的经、注、音义条目。无论哪类文本，原文与被引文本的《释文》音义规则都应保持一致。如果注释规则不一致，则有可能是今本《释文》有误。以《尚书释文》为例进行逐一验证，可充分证实上述规则；其不可印证者，基本可以证实为今本《尚书释文》删阙所致，共十余处，多未被前人所留意。此法扩大了以往《释文》本校法的视野范围，具有普遍性意义，值得措意。更多还原

【Abstract】 The citations within the Jingdian Shiwen(经典释文) fall into two categories: first, the entries concerning the pronunciations and meanings of the original texts and the cited passages when different classics cite each other; second, instances where the Shiwen(释文) itself cites the classics, their commentaries, or phoneticsemantic entries from other texts. Regardless of the category, the principles of phonetic-semantic annotation in the Shiwen(释文) for both the original text and the cited text should remain consistent. Inconsistencies in annotation principles may indicate errors in the received version of the Shiwen(释文). Taking the Shangshu Shiwen(尚书释文) as a case study for verification, this rule is amply confirmed. Cases where consistency cannot be verified can essentially be attributed to omissions or deletions in the received Shangshu Shiwen(尚书释文). This method broadens the scope beyond traditional methods of collating the Shiwen(释文) against its own editions, holds general significance, and merits scholarly attention.更多还原