【摘要】 2016年5月17日习近平总书记在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的重要讲话，为中国自主知识体系的“主体性”建构锚定了根本方向，划定了实践路径。十年来，中国自主知识体系的主体性建构以中国实际为研究起点，植根于中华文明连续性的深厚土壤，其基因通过文明传承的原生积淀、制度演进的本土生成、实践导向的问题意识传承与文明包容的主体坚守得以孕育，在学科体系、学术体系、话语体系建设上取得标志性成就，具备坚实历史合法性、文化根基与实践支撑。这一主体性的理论内核通过四重自觉确立：锚定中国实践的价值立场，超越西方范式的本土创新，回应中国之问的理论突破，构建自主知识的整体逻辑，实现从历史基因到理论形态的转化。在话语表达层面，主体性通过文明自信凝聚国内价值共识，依托本土学术话语体系构建实现话语自主，在文明互鉴中完成国际传播与认同确证，达成从内在建构到外在呈现的延伸。新时代新征程，主体性的巩固与深化需依托四大实践路径：扎根本土实践强化知识生产根基，融通古今资源激活传统基因的现代价值，推动学科融合夯实体系的学科支撑，深化国际对话提升全球治理的知识贡献，最终形成完整的建构闭环，持续彰显中国哲学社会科学的特色与优势。更多还原

【Abstract】 The important speech delivered by General Secretary Xi Jinping at the Symposium on Philosophy and Social Sciences on May 17, 2016, has anchored the fundamental direction and delineated the practical path for constructing “subjectivity” in China’s independent knowledge system. Over the past decade, this construction of subjectivity has taken China’s concrete realities as its point of departure, rooting itself in the deep soil of the continuity of Chinese civilization. Its foundational “genetic” elements have been nurtured through the original accumulation of civilizational inheritance, the endogenous development of institutional evolution, the transmission of a problem-oriented consciousness grounded in practice, and the steadfast commitment to civilizational inclusiveness. Notable achievements have been made in the development of disciplinary systems, academic systems, and discourse systems, providing this subjectivity with solid historical legitimacy, cultural grounding, and practical support. The theoretical core of the subjectivity is established through four dimensions of selfconsciousness: anchoring a value position grounded in Chinese practice, advancing indigenous innovation beyond Western paradigms, achieving theoretical breakthroughs in response to “China’s questions”, and constructing the overall logic of an independent knowledge system to realize the transformation from historical “genetic” resources to theoretical forms. At the level of discourse, subjectivity consolidates domestic value consensus through civilizational confidence, achieves discursive autonomy through constructing a localized academic discourse system, completes its international communication and recognition through civilizational exchange and mutual learning, and extends from internal construction to external representation. In the new era and on the new journey, consolidating and deepening subjectivity must rely on four major practical paths: grounding knowledge production in local practice, integrating historical and contemporary resources to activate the modern value of traditional “genetic” elements, promoting interdisciplinary integration to strengthen systemic support, and deepening international dialogue to enhance knowledge contributions to global governance. Ultimately, it will form a complete closed loop of construction and continuously highlight the distinctiveness and strengths of Chinese philosophy and social sciences.更多还原